Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hodges II Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$99kScience & Tech$33kEducation$18kYouth Development$16kEnvironment$11kArts & Culture$9kHuman Services$2kHealth$850Other$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$466k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$10,000
GA TECH FOUNDATION$8,000
BRENTWOOD SCHOOL$7,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRA$2,000
GA FORESTRY FOUNDATION$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FOREST LAND OWNER FOUNDATION$1,000
LT MISSION$400
CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER$250
FIRST LOVE KIDS$250
ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOREST LAND OWNER FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%FOREST LAND OWNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%FOREST LAND OWNER FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%FOREST LAND OWNER FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%FOREST LAND OWNER FOUNDATION: $250 → 13%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $17k → 22%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $13k → 22%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $13k → 22%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $13k → 22%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $12k → 22%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $11k → 22%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $10k → 22%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $10k → 22%BRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $7k → 22%BRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $7k → 22%WASHINGTON CO CONCERT ASSOC: $6k → 22%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRA: $2k → 22%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRA: $2k → 22%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRA: $2k → 22%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRA: $2k → 22%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRA: $2k → 22%YOUNG LIFE SANDERSVILLE: $2k → 22%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRA: $2k → 22%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRA: $2k → 22%GA FORESTRY FOUNDATION: $2k → 22%SANDERSVILLE SCHOOL AUTHORITY: $2k → 22%GA FORESTRY FOUNDATION: $2k → 22%GA FORESTRY FOUNDATION: $1k → 22%YOUNG LIFE SANDERSVILLE: $1k → 22%ALEXANDER THARPE FUND: $1k → 22%GA FORESTRY FOUNDATION: $1k → 22%ALZHEIMER ASSOC: $500 → 22%WASHINGTON CO HISTORICAL ASSOC: $500 → 22%GA HI-LO TRAIL: $500 → 22%ALZIEMER ASSOCIATION: $500 → 22%FOREST LANDOWNER FOUNDATION: $500 → 22%WASHINGTON CO CONCERT ASSOC: $500 → 22%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRA: $500 → 22%YOUNG LIFE OF SANDERSVILLE: $500 → 22%OTFC FOUNDATION NORTH: $500 → 22%CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER: $500 → 22%OFTC FOUNDATION: $400 → 22%LT MISSION: $400 → 22%FIRST LOVE KIDS: $250 → 22%FIRST LOVE KIDS: $250 → 22%WASH CO ALLIANCE FOR LITERACY: $250 → 22%WASH CO ALLIANCE FOR LITERACY: $250 → 22%CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER: $250 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$187k · 18 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$187k
$6k

Still filing today

39%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    Forest Landowner Foundation Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +280%
  • CL
    CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +89%
  • OF
    OFTC FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $500 · revenue +279%

Funded once

  • SS
    SANDERSVILLE SCHOOL AUTHORITY
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • AT
    ALEXANDER THARPE FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • OF
    OTFC FOUNDATION NORTH
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $97,750 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHGA TECH FOUNDATION: $32,600 · OtherGA TECH FOUNDATIONBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRA: $14,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CSRAWASHINGTON CO CONCERT ASSOC: $6,000 · Other+22 more: $24,350 · Other+22 moreBRENTWOOD SCHOOL INC: $14,250 · EducationOFTC FOUNDATION INC: $500 · EducationCHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $1,750 · ReligionFIRST LOVE KIDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,250 · Youth DevelopmentEMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR: $200 · Crime & Legal
Other$175,200Education$14,750Religion$1,750Youth Development$1,250Crime & Legal$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL INC: $14,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetForest Landowner Foundation Inc: $5,250 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $1,750 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetFIRST LOVE KIDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTRANSYLVANIA CLUB INC: $700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOFTC FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Forest Landowner Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LOVE KIDS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSYLVANIA CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds OFTC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EMANUEL CO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CTR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dickey Family Foundation IncGA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dickey Family Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hodges II Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hodges II Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hodges II’s filings →

    More from the funding graph