Skip to content
Hmong Wisconsin Chamber of Commerce Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Hmong Wisconsin Chamber of Commerce Inc

Hwcc is a community development financial institution (cdfi) providing economic development assistance in business planning, market analysis, marketing strategies, effective day-to-day business operations and much more.

$236k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Community Improvement$604kHuman Services$36kPhilanthropy$28kHealth$28kEmployment$26kFood & Nutrition$19kRecreation & Sports$13k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $231,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $236,250 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $193k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECTWISE CONSULTING LLC$37,500
BENEVOLENCE FIRST INC$28,000
VIDA AESTHETIC LLC$25,000
SOUL THAI LLC$22,500
V NAIL AND BEAUTY LLC$17,000
PIPELINE WI ATHLETICS LLC$12,500
INDIGO NAIL LOUNGE LLC$10,000
WAUSAU FAMILY PHARMACY LLC$10,000
PRESTIGE MECHANICAL LLC$10,000
NICHE BOOK BAR LLC$10,000
WATCHDOG EATS LLC DBA FRED'S FROZEN CUSTARD & GRILL$10,000
THE MOONLIT BAKERY LLC$8,750
FISH CAVE LLC$8,750
LOR CHIROPRACTIC$8,750
SU PLUS TWO LLC$6,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BENEVOLENCE FIRST INC: $28k → 5%BIG POT & GRILL LLC: $10k → 6%BIG SHOTS SPORTS LLC: $10k → 6%PRESTIGE MECHANICAL LLC: $10k → 6%BOWN NINETY-ONE LLC: $10k → 7%HMONG CULTURE SERVICES LLC: $10k → 9%LITTLE OWLS CHILD CARE CENTER LLC: $10k → 9%MOUA REAL ESTATE LLC: $10k → 10%BLACK GIRL MAGIC BEAUTY LLC: $10k → 10%YANG INVESTMENTS LLC DBA YUMMEE TREATS: $10k → 10%EGGROLL EXPRESS: $10k → 11%FAITHFUL CONSULTING LLC: $10k → 11%THE FINISHING TOUCH NAILS: $10k → 11%V NAIL AND BEAUTY LLC: $17k → 12%SOUL THAI LLC: $23k → 12%PROJECTWISE CONSULTING LLC: $38k → 13%ALTERNATIVE FAMILY SERVICES LLC: $10k → 17%TMH ENTERPRISES LLC: $10k → 5%FISH CAVE LLC: $10k → 6%PRESTIGE MECHANICAL LLC: $10k → 6%MAI'S DELI LLC: $10k → 7%VIDA AESTHETIC LLC: $25k → 10%FOX CITY FLIX LLC: $10k → 11%INDIGO NAIL LOUNGE LLC: $10k → 12%ROOTED MKE LLC: $10k → 17%COUA XIONG LLC DBA CC INTERIORS: $10k → 7%JNJ CRAFTWORKS LLC DBA JNJ GIFTS AND MORE: $10k → 10%OCEAN BLUE LLC: $10k → 11%MUANG THAI RESTAURANT INC: $10k → 12%NYOB ZOO TV LLC: $10k → 17%YOUR MECHANIC SHOP: $10k → 7%FMS LLC DBA MORRIS RAMEN: $10k → 10%THE MOONLIT BAKERY LLC: $10k → 11%WATCHDOG EATS LLC DBA FRED'S FROZEN CUSTARD & GRILL: $10k → 17%PIPELINE WI ATHLETICS LLC: $13k → 10%WAUSAU FAMILY PHARMACY LLC: $10k → 11%TRICICLO PERU LLC: $10k → 17%WAUSAU FAMILY PHARMACY LLC: $10k → 11%ROYAL DELI LLC: $10k → 11%PROJECTWISE CONSULTING LLC: $10k → 11%HORIZON TAX LLC: $10k → 17%EZ CREDIT CAR CORP LLC: $10k → 17%JAY'S GINSING INC: $10k → 11%LILY FIERCE LLC: $10k → 17%LUV LLC: $10k → 11%GUISSE CHILD CARE CONSULTING LLC: $10k → 17%PLEE BEAUTY LLC: $10k → 11%DDB MEDIAWORKS LLC DBA DARICK BOOKS: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$142k · 6 repeat orgs$610k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
49

Total granted

$142k
$464k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PROJECTWISE CONSULTING LLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $48k
  • PM
    PRESTIGE MECHANICAL LLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k
  • WF
    WAUSAU FAMILY PHARMACY LLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k

Funded once

  • RD
    ROYAL DELI LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • EE
    EGGROLL EXPRESS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • AF
    ALTERNATIVE FAMILY SERVICES LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2023 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECTWISE CONSULTING LLC: $47,500 · OtherPROJECTWISE CONSULTING LLCBENEVOLENCE FIRST INC: $28,000 · Other+63 more: $676,972 · Other+63 more
Other$752,472

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Wisconsin Women's Bus…
Wisconsin Women's Business Initiative CorporationWI15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wisconsin Women's Business Initiative Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hmong Wisconsin Chamber of Commerce’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home