Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Ohio · Public charity

Historic Warehouse District Development Corporation of Cleveland

Our mission is to champion and inspire opportunities for growth in the warehouse district by continuing our work to provide sustained program funding, support, and resources for all aspects of the warehouse district including through our historic preservation easement program that aims to protect and preserve into perpetuity the…

$18k
Granted FY2023
1
Itemized grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$17k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$17,065
Largest grant, FY2023
$17,065
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$864k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Downtown Cleveland Alliance$17,06510%

Compare Historic Warehouse District Development Corporation of Cleveland with peer funders

About Historic Warehouse District Development Corporation of Cleveland

How much does Historic Warehouse District Development Corporation of Cleveland give?
Historic Warehouse District Development Corporation of Cleveland reported 1 itemized grants totaling $17,065, out of $17,600 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does Historic Warehouse District Development Corporation of Cleveland fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Community Improvement (100%).
Who are Historic Warehouse District Development Corporation of Cleveland's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: Downtown Cleveland Alliance ($17k).
Where is Historic Warehouse District Development Corporation of Cleveland based?
Historic Warehouse District Development Corporation of Cleveland is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $3k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Historic Warehouse District Development Corporation of Cleveland’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home