· Private foundation
Hirschfeld & Associates Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k92 grants · $171k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $427k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cong Ahavas Mordechai Inc | $40,000 |
| Cong Beth Pinchas | $36,000 |
| KEREN ALOZOR INC | $30,000 |
| Cong Beth Pinchas | $30,000 |
| Cong Beth Pinchas | $28,000 |
| KEREN ALOZOR INC | $25,000 |
| Cong Beth Pinchas | $25,000 |
| KEREN ALOZOR INC | $22,000 |
| United Talmudical Academy | $21,000 |
| Cong Beth Pinchas | $20,000 |
| KEREN ALOZOR INC | $20,000 |
| Cong Ahavas Mordechai Inc | $20,000 |
| Cong Ahavas Mordechai Inc | $19,000 |
| Cong Ahavas Mordechai Inc | $15,000 |
| Cong Bais Yaakov Nechamia Dsatmar | $14,100 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +154% since the first grant, against +82% for those funded once.
45 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2023, 18 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $211k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CACong Ahavas Mordechai Inc3× · 2021–2023 · $393k
- CBCong Beth Pinchas4× · 2020–2023 · $296k
- CBCong B Y N5× · 2018–2022 · $106k
Funded once
- IHICHID HATORAH VHACHESEDone grant, 2020 · $120k
- CTCongregation Toldos Avruham Yitzckone grant, 2022 · $32k
- CBCong Bais Yaakov Nechamia Dsatmaone grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To award financial grants to religios orthodox jewish organizations and to help by financial means, the needy, sick and disabled people.
Assistance to the indigent
Charitable organization for the welfare, development, and relief of communities that are overburdened with poverty and help fund judaic studies
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
To help disadvantaged children, widows and orphans by providing food, clothing, supplies and grants to charitable tax exempt organizations.
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
How this is measured
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 208 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Keren Ish Foundation · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · S&E Foundation · Chayim V Chesed · Blum Foundation · Bbc Foundation · R' Shaya Ben Moshe Foundation · Nimlach Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Hirschfeld & Associates Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hirschfeld & Associates Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Hirschfeld & Associates’ filings →