Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Ohio · Public charity

Hirsch Carrol W Ta

Under Trust Agreement dated December 16, 1988, modified on July 16,1989 and further modified on June 9, 1992, the trustee shalldistribute the net income of the Trust in equal shares to TheJewish Community Federation and Douglas College. Under the Ohio Institutional Funds Act of 1989, the beneficiaries have chosen to receive the maximum…

$4.9M
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
1
Organizations funded FY2021
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2021
$2,477,759
Largest grant, FY2021
$2,477,759
States reached, FY2021
2

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Associate Alumnae of Douglass College$2,477,7591n/a

Compare Hirsch Carrol W Ta with peer funders

About Hirsch Carrol W Ta

How much does Hirsch Carrol W Ta give?
Hirsch Carrol W Ta reported 2 grants totaling $4,895,519 in its FY2021 IRS filing.
What does Hirsch Carrol W Ta fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2021, its largest causes are Education (50%), Philanthropy (50%).
Who are Hirsch Carrol W Ta's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2021: Associate Alumnae of Douglass College ($2.5M).
Where is Hirsch Carrol W Ta based?
Hirsch Carrol W Ta is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record and reports $78 of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home