Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herbert H & Fern Elliott Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$269kEducation$153kYouth Development$98kPhilanthropy$71kHealth$66kHuman Services$50kArts & Culture$26kCrime & Legal$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SHUL$31,800
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$17,140
MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION$10,000
JEWISH YOUTH FOUNDATION$5,400
WASHINGTON STATE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$2,500
TEMPLE JEREMIAH$2,500
MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION$1,800
FIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE$1,500
UPAF$1,500
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE$1,500
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,250
HOLOCAUST EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTER$1,000
OVATION JEWISH HOME$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TOMORROW'S HOPE: $3k → 8%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 17%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 17%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 17%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 17%MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $420 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
CA
MO
TN
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$715k · 30 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
26

Total granted

$715k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+25%

Still filing today

37%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +346%
  • GRAND AVENUE CLUB INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $38k · revenue +16%
  • WS
    WASHINGTON STATE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • YI
    YOUNG ISRAEL OF TOCO HILLS
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • MC
    MITZVAH CORPS
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Als Association Inc Wisconsin Chapter

To lead the fight to cure and treat als through global, cutting-edge research, and to empower people living with als in wisconsin, and their families, to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.

Health
2
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
5
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
6
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
7
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating acurefor multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies, leverage data to…

Health
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
10
Milwaukee Jewish Day School Inc

Where academic excellence and jewish values prepare children for a lifetime of success, leadership and engagement with the world.

—
11
Burnett Medical Center Inc

The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…

Health
12
Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc

Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Stage Milwaukee; the most unlike its peers is Shirts Across America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SHUL: $173,470 · OtherTHE SHULJEWISH YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $96,000 · OtherJEWISH YOUTH FOUNDATION INCGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $37,500 · OtherGRAND AVENUE CLUB INCCHABAD OF CHARLESTONCENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE: $27,800 · OtherOVATION JEWISH HOME: $23,800 · OtherTEMPLE JEREMIAH: $23,685 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $22,700 · Other+32 more: $137,591 · Other+32 moreTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $140,020 · EducationTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCL…NORTH SHORE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $9,900 · EducationNORTH SHORE MONTESSO…+1 more: $1,650 · EducationMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $61,000 · PhilanthropyMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $15,550 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,750 · HealthJEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER INC: $5,000 · Health+5 more: $1,740 · HealthMILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $13,920 · Human ServicesTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $4,500 · Human ServicesTOMORROWS HOPE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE: $10,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterShirts Across America: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$542,546Education$151,570Philanthropy$61,000Health$30,040Human Services$20,920Arts & Culture$11,500Housing & Shelter$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $140,020 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $61,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $37,500 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $22,700 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $15,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $13,920 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $9,900 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMORROWS HOPE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION: $1,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS Foundation of Chicago: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND AVENUE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON STATE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE ↗
  • Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TOMORROWS HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Milwaukee Jewish Federation IncWI23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Harri Hoffmann Family Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Pelz Family Foundation Inc · Howard Frankenthal Family Foundation Ltd · Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herbert H & Fern Elliott Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herbert H & Fern Elliott Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Herbert H & Fern Elliott Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Herbert H & Fern Elliott Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herbert H & Fern Elliott Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph