Skip to content

· Public charity

Heppner Economic Development Corp Dba Willow Cr Valley Economic Dev Group

Encourage & support the retention and expansion of existing businesses in the heppner, lexington and ione, oregon areas and to support economic growth in the local communities.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$338k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Community Improvement$2.8MHousing & Shelter$1.1MRecreation & Sports$184kEducation$180kHuman Services$132kFood & Nutrition$60kHealth$35kAnimals$13k
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 30 grants below total $1,023,016, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,062,002 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $38,986 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $485k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $158k
  • $250k+1 grant · $338k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$816k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA BASIN GEN CONSTRUCT$338,234
HEPPNER DAY CARE$57,470
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SOUTH MC$50,250
WILLOW CREEK PARK DISTRICT$50,000
Individual grant recipient$46,591
CABINETS FLOORS & MORE INC$43,720
HEPPNER LITTLE LEAGUE$40,530
Individual grant recipient$40,000
HEPPNER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$34,337
CLYDE MARIE ESTES TRUSTEE$30,000
WILLOW CREEK ASSISTED LIVING$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$24,286
ROD WILSON CONSTRUCTION SERVI$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $238k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%HEPPNER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $63k → 13%HEPPNER DAY CARE: $57k → 13%HEPPNER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $34k → 13%HEPPNER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%HEPPNER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $19k → 13%HEPPNER DAY CARE: $15k → 13%HEPPNER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13k → 13%HEPPNER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 32 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
56

Total granted

$3.0M
$1.0M

Still filing today

9%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $325k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HD
    Heppner Day Care Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $72k · revenue +7%
  • WC
    WILLOW CREEK COUNTRY CLUB
    3× · 2022–2025 · $34k · revenue +8%
  • HC
    HEPPNER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $29k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $53k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • MC
    MORROW CO LIVESTOCK GROWERS
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $906,694 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLUMBIA BASIN GEN CONSTRUCT: $399,331 · OtherCOLUMBIA BASIN GEN CONSTRUCTCITY OF IONE: $271,451 · OtherCITY OF IONEIndividual grant recipient: $198,360 · Other+100 more: $2,504,133 · Other+100 moreHEPPNER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $165,851 · Human ServicesHeppner Day Care Inc: $72,470 · Human Services
Other$4,279,969Human Services$238,321

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEPPNER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $165,851 over 6y, 24% of budgetHeppner Day Care Inc: $72,470 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetWILLOW CREEK COUNTRY CLUB: $33,567 over 3y, 16% of budgetHEPPNER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $29,200 over 2y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEPPNER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Heppner Day Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW CREEK COUNTRY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds HEPPNER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heppner Economic Development Corp Dba Willow Cr Valley Economic Dev Group funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heppner Economic Development Corp Dba Willow Cr Valley Economic Dev Group. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Heppner Community Foundation: 6% of income from government
  • Heppner Day Care Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Heppner Economic Development Corp Dba Willow Cr Valley Economic Dev Group’s filings →

More from the funding graph