Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Helen Wade Greene Charitable Trust Green100

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$360k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Crime & Legal$2.8MArts & Culture$267kEducation$162kHealth$111kHuman Services$40kPhilanthropy$20k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$360,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDWARD LEE AND SLOCOMB HOLLIS PERRY$360,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $5k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $5k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $5k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$3.4M
$0

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART
    4× · 2019–2023 · $127k · revenue +32%
  • TM
    The Musical Arts Association
    5× · 2019–2023 · $110k · revenue +39%
  • CS
    CENTRAL SCHOOL OF PRACTICAL NURSING INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $90k · revenue +18%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Cleveland Institute of Music

    The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

    Education
    2
    The Central European University

    Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

    International
    3
    Cleveland Medical Library Association
    Education
    4
    Cleveland Center for Arts and Technology

    Mission: for all of our students to achieve optimal health by integrating mental and physical well-being and life purpose. values: we will improve the lives of our students and our community. we will fight inherently inequitable systems.…

    Arts & Culture
    5
    Western Reserve Historical Society

    Western reserve historical society preserves and uses its collections, historic sites, and museums to inspire people to discover the american experience by exploring the tangible history of northeast ohio.

    Arts & Culture
    6
    John Carroll University

    As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

    Education
    7
    Otterbein University

    Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

    Education
    8
    The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum Inc

    Born from the collision of rhythm & blues, country, and gospel, rock & roll is a spirit that is inclusive and ever-changing. the rock & roll hall of fame celebrates the sound of youth culture and honors the artists whose music connects us…

    Arts & Culture
    9
    Wesleyan University

    Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

    Education
    10
    Drexel University

    Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

    Education
    11
    The College of Wooster

    The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

    Education
    12
    University of Miami

    See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cleveland Institute of Art and the most unlike its peers is The Musical Arts Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    6/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    EDWARD LEE AND SLOCOMB HOLLIS PERRY — $2,755,000 · OtherEDWARD LEE AND SLOCOMB HOLLIS PERRY+1 more — $81,000 · OtherCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART — $127,000 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts Association — $110,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL SCHOOL OF PRACTICAL NURSING INC — $90,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $72,000 · EducationTHE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART — $30,000 · EducationBeech Brook — $40,000 · HealthHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $20,000 · Philanthropy
    Other$2,836,000Arts & Culture$237,000Education$192,000Health$40,000Human Services$30,000Philanthropy$20,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART — $127,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association — $110,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL SCHOOL OF PRACTICAL NURSING INC — $90,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $72,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBeech Brook — $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART
    • Who funds The Musical Arts Association
    • Who funds CENTRAL SCHOOL OF PRACTICAL NURSING INC
    • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    • Who funds Beech Brook
    • Who funds THE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART
    • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC
    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Helen Wade Greene Charitable Trust Green100 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph