Skip to content

· Public charity

Helen Keller Services

To enable individuals who are blind, visually-impaired, deaf-blind and/or have combined hearing-vision loss to live, work, and thrive in their community of choice.

$741k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$168k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Education$1.7MScience & Tech$241k
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $503,235, the rows itemized in this filing. The $741,401 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $238,166 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $477k
$89,857
Median grant
5
States reached
$165M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS$168,065
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY$145,660
University of Colorado$89,857
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA$73,487
Perkins School for the Blind$26,166
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Perkins School for the Blind: $26k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $80k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $168k → 15%Western Oregon University: $469k → 13%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $146k → 22%Perkins School for the Blind: $26k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $73k → 9%University of Kansas: $73k → 15%Western Oregon University: $168k → 13%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $126k → 22%Perkins School for the Blind: $26k → 8%University of Montana: $47k → 9%Virginia Commonwealth University: $107k → 22%Perkins School for the Blind: $19k → 8%University of Montana: $46k → 9%Virginia Commonwealth University: $66k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$2.0M
$0

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
EducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Kansas Center for Research Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $241k · revenue +34%
  • PS
    PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND
    4× · 2019–2022 · $98k · revenue +5%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $93k · revenue +46%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    3/3
    Grantees still filing
    3/3
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Western Oregon University: $636,752 · OtherWestern Oregon UniversityVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS: $444,509 · OtherVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUSREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $286,942 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOUNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $153,623 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MONTANAUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc: $240,811 · Science & TechUniversity of…PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $98,015 · EducationPERKINS SCH…THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $93,252 · EducationTHE UNIVERS…
    Other$1,521,826Science & Tech$240,811Education$191,267

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc: $240,811 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $98,015 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $93,252 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds University of Kansas Center for Research Inc ↗
    • Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
    • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Helen Keller Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helen Keller Services. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
    • Perkins School for the Blind: 6% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helen Keller Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph