Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helen & Rita Lurie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$676k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.1MPhilanthropy$1.2MHuman Services$575kInternational$50kArts & Culture$38kEducation$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$20k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $386k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$56,700
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE$250,000
NYU MEDICAL SCHOOL$120,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$94,500
HIASINC$64,700
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY$56,700
SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES$50,000
DIRECT RELIEF FOR UKRAINE$25,000
UJA ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND$10,500
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $407k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $24k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $24k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $20k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $15k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $15k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $15k → 15%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $57k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $50k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $36k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $36k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $30k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $25k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $25k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $20k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $18k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 14 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$5.6M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
-13%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $708k · revenue +39%
  • MN
    METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $295k · revenue +142%
  • SC
    SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $274k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…

Health
3
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
4
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…

Health
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
10
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
11
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
12
Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Communal Fund; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $2,314,650 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGENYU MEDICAL SCHOOL: $923,600 · OtherNYU MEDICAL SCHOOLHIASINC: $513,800 · OtherHIASINC+4 more: $194,000 · OtherUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $708,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH …+1 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $295,200 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN …SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $274,000 · Human ServicesSELFHELP COMM…JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $112,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUN…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $180,500 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationNEW JERSEY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $43,400 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,946,050Philanthropy$728,000Human Services$681,200Education$200,500Health$50,000Arts & Culture$43,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $708,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $295,200 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $274,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $180,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $112,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $43,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY ↗
  • Who funds SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helen & Rita Lurie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helen & Rita Lurie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Helen & Rita Lurie Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Helen & Rita Lurie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Helen & Rita Lurie’s filings →

More from the funding graph