Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heitmann Foundation II Comerica Bank & Trust Na

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$20kEducation$19kReligion$16kYouth Development$14kHousing & Shelter$10kEnvironment$8kHuman Services$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,098
Median grant
1
States reached
$240k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA TROOP 642$3,098
CHAPELWOOD FOUNDATION$3,098
GAY HILL-MOUND-CEDAR HILL VFD$3,098
CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OASIS: $3k → 12%MAKING IT BETTER: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$64k · 9 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$64k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+66%

Still filing today

33%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHAPELWOOD FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $20k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA TROOP 642
    3× · 2020–2025 · $11k
  • TM
    THE MOUNT CARMEL ECC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $10k

Funded once

  • CA
    CORNERSTONE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -30%
  • TK
    The Kinkaid School Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +83%
  • T6
    TROOP 642
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Greatest School in West Houston

Christian pre-school from age 3-months to school-age, and school from

—
2
St Stephen's Episcopal School

St. Stephen's Episcopal School - Houston ("St. Stephen's", "the School") nurtures each child's academic, creative, and spiritual potential.

Education
3
The Fay School

See Schedule O. The Fay School ("the School") is a nonsectarian, not-for-profit, co-educational school in which children of diverse talents and backgrounds with strong academic abilities are offered a high-quality education in a secure,…

—
4
Presbyterian School

Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child - this is the founding premise upon which Presbyterian School nurtures and challenges its students. The school provides an educational program of the highest…

Education
5
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
6
The Awty International School

See Schedule OThe purpose of Awty International School (Awty) is to create an environment where students experience excellence every day to make their mark on the world alongside their community, in a spirit of curiosity, courage and…

—
7
Texas Foundation for Educational Advancement Inc dba the Da Vinci School

School's mission is to help establish basic skills through teaching methods that enhance a child's joy in learning, ability to learn, and interest in learning while fostering the child's self-confidence.

Education
8
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
9
St John's School

See Schedule OSt. John's School is an independent, co-educational day school presenting a 13-year sequence of college preparatory training. A non-profit institution, it was founded in 1946 to provide the community with a school of exacting…

—
10
The Post Oak School

See Schedule OThe mission of The Post Oak School is to prepare an outstanding Montessori environment that fosters collaboration, cooperation and peace and to provide experiences that promote curiosity, inquiry and engagement. Designed…

Education
11
White Rock Montessori Elementary School of the Good Samaritan Inc

The organization's mission is to operate an elementary school and daycare program for children of working parents. Following the principles of Dr. Maria Montessori, the school provides a consistent framework for learning through the…

Education
12
Made Houston

MADE Houston was formed to create a school community focused on nurturing and developing the unique academic and social needs of students with learning differences and to successfully transition students into mainstream schools.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission; the most unlike its peers is Sara's Pre-School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHAPELWOOD FOUNDATION: $20,340 · OtherCHAPELWOOD FOUNDATIONBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA TROOP 642: $10,698 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA TROOP 642THE MOUNT CARMEL ECC: $9,750 · OtherTHE MOUNT CARMEL ECCTROOP 642: $3,750 · OtherTROOP 642GAY-MOUND-CEDAR HILL VFD INC: $3,098 · OtherCHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3,000 · Other+7 more: $10,730 · Other+7 moreCORNERSTONE ACADEMY: $6,370 · EducationCORNERSTONE ACAD…The Kinkaid School Inc: $3,750 · EducationThe Kinkaid Scho…SARA'S PRE-SCHOOL INC: $3,600 · EducationSARA'S PRE-SCHOO…Trinity University: $1,000 · EducationTrinity Universi…TREES OF HOPE: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterTREES OF HO…STAR OF HOPE MISSION: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterSTAR OF HOP…River Oaks Garden Club: $7,664 · EnvironmentOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $3,185 · Human ServicesMaking It Better dba Literacy Now: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$61,366Education$14,720Housing & Shelter$10,000Environment$7,664Human Services$5,685

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRiver Oaks Garden Club: $7,664 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCORNERSTONE ACADEMY: $6,370 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTREES OF HOPE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kinkaid School Inc: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARA'S PRE-SCHOOL INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $3,185 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGAY-MOUND-CEDAR HILL VFD INC: $3,098 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetMaking It Better dba Literacy Now: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTrinity University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds River Oaks Garden Club ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds TREES OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds The Kinkaid School Inc ↗
  • Who funds SARA'S PRE-SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds GAY-MOUND-CEDAR HILL VFD INC ↗
  • Who funds Making It Better dba Literacy Now ↗
  • Who funds Trinity University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heitmann Foundation II Comerica Bank & Trust Na funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heitmann Foundation II Comerica Bank & Trust Na. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heitmann Foundation II Comerica Bank & Trust Na’s filings →

    More from the funding graph