Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heffner Rosenwald Howard Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$457kHealth$82kEnvironment$43kCivil Rights$13kArts & Culture$4kHousing & Shelter$4k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,615
Median grant
1
States reached
$154k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LETS BREAKTHROUGH INC$12,615
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 19% of grant dollars ($114k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 81% that went abroad ($487k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO CLINIC: $1k → 9%THE LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $250 → 9%LETS BREAKTHROUGH INC: $13k → 17%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $3k → 13%COMMON PURPOSE US INC: $50k → 14%ST JOHN'S RIVERKEEPER: $10k → 14%ST JOHN'S RIVERKEEPER: $10k → 14%ST JOHN'S RIVERKEEPER: $6k → 14%ST JOHN'S RIVERKEEPER: $6k → 14%ST JOHN'S RIVERKEEPER: $6k → 14%ST JOHN'S RIVERKEEPER: $6k → 14%CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOLFSON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $850 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 81% of all-years giving ($487k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$487k · 9 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of Heffner Rosenwald Howard Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 8% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 1%.

Heffner Rosenwald Howard Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 88% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$530k · 3 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$530k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+36%

Still filing today

33%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHousing & ShelterHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COMMON PURPOSE CHARITABLE TRUST
    5× · 2017–2022 · $408k
  • TW
    THE WREN PROJECT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $80k
  • SJ
    ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • CP
    COMMON PURPOSE US INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +176%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CA
    CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +156%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
3
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
4
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
5
Business and Human Rights Resource Centre

We work with everyone to advance human rights in business and eradicate abuse by 1. amplifying the voices of the vulnerable and human rights advocates in civil society, media, companies, and governments. 2. helping communities and ngos get…

Employment
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
8
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
9
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health
12
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMON PURPOSE CHARITABLE TRUST: $407,554 · OtherCOMMON PURPOSE CHARITABLE TRUSTTHE WREN PROJECT: $79,505 · OtherTHE WREN PROJECT+3 more: $4,350 · OtherCOMMON PURPOSE US INC: $49,810 · EducationCOMMON PU…CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC: $2,500 · EducationST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $42,550 · EnvironmentLET'S BREAKTHROUGH INC: $12,615 · Crime & LegalMAYO CLINIC: $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 · HealthTHE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$491,409Education$52,310Environment$42,550Crime & Legal$12,615Health$1,250Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $42,550 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetLET'S BREAKTHROUGH INC: $12,615 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heffner Rosenwald Howard Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heffner Rosenwald Howard Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Cathedral Arts Project Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Heffner Rosenwald Howard’s filings →

More from the funding graph