Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hefflefinger Scholarship Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$41kRecreation & Sports$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$775
Median grant
4
States reached
$192k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS$3,800
CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE$1,350
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$775
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$675
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $600 → 11%VANGUARD UNIVERSITY: $600 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $500 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $250 → 11%CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $900 → 14%COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS: $4k → 18%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $500 → 9%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $600 → 16%GEORGETOWN UNIVERISTY: $500 → 14%JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY: $400 → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $500 → 13%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $775 → 14%CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $750 → 14%COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS: $2k → 18%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $750 → 19%CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $600 → 14%COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS: $2k → 18%FRESNO STATE UNIVERSITY: $600 → 19%CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE: $1k → 12%COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS: $750 → 18%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE: $1k → 12%COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS: $600 → 18%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 19%REEDLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $750 → 19%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%FRESNO STATE UNIVERSITY: $400 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IN
CA
AZ
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35k · 7 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$35k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+27%

Still filing today

14%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $11k
  • SC
    SEQUOIAS CCD
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k
  • CS
    California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • University of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2020 · $775 · revenue +52%
  • RC
    REEDLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION FORMERLY KINGS RIVER CC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $750 · revenue -32%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVIS
    one grant, 2022 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
2
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
7
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
8
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
9
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
10
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
11
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
12
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Reedley College Foundation Formerly Kings River Cc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE: $10,600 · OtherCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATESEQUOIAS CCD: $9,000 · OtherSEQUOIAS CCDCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated: $7,025 · OtherCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Association IncorporatedUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $3,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIATEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $2,925 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY+7 more: $5,475 · Other+7 moreUniversity of Chicago: $775 · EducationUniversit…VANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL: $600 · EducationVANGUARD …Cornell University: $600 · EducationCornell U…SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $500 · EducationSARAH LAW…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $500 · EducationUniversit…Jacksonville University: $400 · EducationJacksonvi…
Other$38,525Education$3,375

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated: $7,025 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $775 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREEDLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION FORMERLY KINGS RIVER CC FOUNDATION: $750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJacksonville University: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds REEDLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION FORMERLY KINGS RIVER CC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Jacksonville University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hefflefinger Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hefflefinger Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jacksonville University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hefflefinger Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph