Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

California · Public charity

Hebrew Free Loan Association of San Francisco

To aid worthy jewish people to be and remain self-supporting and self-respecting persons by aid of loans, grants and such services as the individual may require. Such loans, grants and services shall be rendered without interest or other charges. Loans are given for emergencies, personal financial challenges, tuition and other…

$59k
Granted FY2022
1
Itemized grants FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Hebrew Free Loan Association of San Francisco’s FY2022 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Itemized, FY2022
$28k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2022
$28,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$28,000
States reached, FY2022
1
Total assets, FY2022
$27M

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2022.

STANFORD UNIVERSITY$28,000

Compare Hebrew Free Loan Association of San Francisco with peer funders

About Hebrew Free Loan Association of San Francisco

How much does Hebrew Free Loan Association of San Francisco give?
Hebrew Free Loan Association of San Francisco reported 1 itemized grants totaling $28,000, out of $58,594 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2022 IRS filing.
What does Hebrew Free Loan Association of San Francisco fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Where is Hebrew Free Loan Association of San Francisco based?
Hebrew Free Loan Association of San Francisco is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $88k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hebrew Free Loan Association of San Francisco’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home