Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Heart Rhythm Society Inc

To improve the care of patients by promoting education, research and optimal health care policies and standards.

$244k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Health$985kEducation$200kEmployment$55kScience & Tech$50kCommunity Improvement$30k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $205,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $244,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $39,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$50,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA$37,500
LUMIA HEALTH INC$30,000
INOMAGEN THERAPEUTICS INC$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$12,500
CONFORM MEDICAL INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Anumana Inc: $10k → 8%LUMIA HEALTH INC: $30k → 16%Mayo Clinic: $50k → 9%Stanford University: $50k → 7%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA: $38k → 9%RCE TECHNOLOGIES: $15k → 11%REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $13k → 16%VPG MEDICAL: $10k → 14%New York University School of Medicine: $50k → 17%Baylor College: $50k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $50k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $50k → 10%Vanderbilt University: $50k → 14%KILELE HEALTH: $15k → 14%The Ohio State University: $50k → 15%TeleHealth Care Solutions LLC: $15k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $50k → 9%INOMAGEN THERAPEUTICS INC: $15k → 14%Johns Hopkins University: $50k → 19%DYNOCARDIA: $30k → 8%NYU Grossman School of Medicine: $50k → 17%The Ohio State University: $50k → 15%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 15%CONFORM MEDICAL INC: $10k → 17%Ximio Health Inc: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
AZ
TN
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of Heart Rhythm Society Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Heart Rhythm Society Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$550k · 4 repeat orgs$570k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
14

Total granted

$550k
$415k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+56%

Still filing today

75%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    New York University
    3× · 2019–2024 · $150k · revenue +51%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2024 · $150k · revenue +25%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • BC
    BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Centergraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
7
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
8
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
11
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
12
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baylor College of Medicine and the most unlike its peers is The Uc Davis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYBAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE — $50,000 · OtherBAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINEUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAUniversity of Wisconsin Madison — $50,000 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $37,500 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIADYNOCARDIA — $30,000 · OtherLUMIA HEALTH INC — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherXimio Health Inc — $30,000 · Other+8 more — $100,000 · Other+8 moreNew York University — $150,000 · EducationNew York UniversityTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYBaylor College of Medicine — $50,000 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine+1 more — $12,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 · HealthTHE UNIVERSITY OF…Vanderbilt University Medical Center — $50,000 · HealthVanderbilt Univer…MAYO CLINIC — $50,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC
Other$607,500Education$512,500Health$200,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNew York University — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Heart Rhythm Society Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • The University of Vermont Medical Center1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph