Skip to content

Oregon · Public charity

Health Professionals Network for Tigray

We develop and implement programs and initiatives based on needs asses ments conducted by health professionals and experts on the ground in Tigray, Ethiopia and Sudan.

$14k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
4
Organizations funded FY2023
25%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$14,320
Largest grant, FY2024
$14,320
Organizations funded a year
4 to 5
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$53k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 25% of the organizations Health Professionals Network for Tigray funded were first-time grantees, receiving 90% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
InternationalPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$14k0%
FY20234$96k25%
FY20225$209k80%
FY20214$92kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

International$243kHealth$60kHuman Services$58kArts & Culture$50k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
KY
VA
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Where it is load-bearing

Health Professionals Network for Tigray supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTigray Development Association in North America: $113,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Society for Better Health Access: $101,161 over 2y, 29% of budgetTigrai Media House Dba Tigrai Media House: $50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetOperation Rescue Childcare Projects: $48,389 over 1y, 46% of budgetEthiopian Community Dev Council Inc: $29,596 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBenevolent Healthcare Foundation: $28,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSos International Inc: $23,732 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Health Professionals Network for Tigray with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Health Professionals Network for Tigray?

Find your warmest path to Health Professionals Network for Tigray through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Health Professionals Network for Tigray

How much does Health Professionals Network for Tigray give?
Health Professionals Network for Tigray reported 1 grants totaling $14,320 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 5 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Health Professionals Network for Tigray fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are International (59%), Health (15%), Human Services (14%).
Who are Health Professionals Network for Tigray's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Tigray Development Association in North America ($113k), International Society for Better Health Access ($101k), Tigrai Media House Dba Tigrai Media House ($50k).
Does Health Professionals Network for Tigray fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 25% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Health Professionals Network for Tigray?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Paypal Charitable Giving Fund, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is Health Professionals Network for Tigray based?
Health Professionals Network for Tigray is based in OR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Health Professionals Network for Tigray’s filings →

More from the funding graph