Skip to content

Massachusetts · Public charity

Health Effects Institute

HEALTH EFFECTS INSTITUTE's mission is to conduct independent research to provide high-quality, impartial and relevant science on the health effects of air pollution. This is done by identifying the highest priority areas for health effect research; funding and overseeing research; providing independent review of related research…

$7.2M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
18
Itemized grants FY2025
15
Organizations funded FY2024
7%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$5.7M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$258,121
Largest grant, FY2025
$1,122,489
Organizations funded a year
7 to 15
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
12
Total assets, FY2025
$10M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 7% of the organizations Health Effects Institute funded were first-time grantees, receiving 2% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving14$4.3M7%
FY202415$4.2M7%
FY202314$3.6M14%
FY202213$2.2M31%
FY202110$1.3M40%
FY20207$402k0%
FY20198$778k13%
FY20189$833k22%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$27M

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Texas$3,754,0519n/a
Colorado State University$1,371,9683n/a
Trustees of Boston University$1,278,15140%
Oregon State University$1,253,6686n/a
University of Washington$1,144,4946n/a
Georgia Tech Research Corporation$1,038,84570%
Emory University$1,003,05350%
Pennsylvania State University$934,7374n/a
George Mason University Foundation Inc$925,60530%
University of California Davis$741,7104n/a
Show all 27 grantees
All grantees of Health Effects Institute by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Texas$3,754,0519n/a
Colorado State University$1,371,9683n/a
Trustees of Boston University$1,278,15140%
Oregon State University$1,253,6686n/a
University of Washington$1,144,4946n/a
Georgia Tech Research Corporation$1,038,84570%
Emory University$1,003,05350%
Pennsylvania State University$934,7374n/a
George Mason University Foundation Inc$925,60530%
University of California Davis$741,7104n/a
Regents of the University of Michigan$739,4666n/a
Regents of the University of Colorado$725,3345n/a
Regents Univ of California$640,5876n/a
University of Massachusetts$500,0004n/a
Drexel University$452,50330%
University of Florida$452,3494n/a
Regents of the University of California at Irvine$447,8494n/a
East Carolina University$397,0843n/a
Duke University$391,25910%
Nc State University$295,5153n/a
Texas A&M Transportation Institute$250,9342n/a
Northwestern University$235,6341n/a
Boston University$199,5111n/a
University of Rochester$136,23620%
Dri Research Foundation$116,840213%
The George Washington University$116,40010%
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$92,7683n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Health Effects Institute supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Boston University: $1,278,151 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia Tech Research Corporation: $1,038,845 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEmory University: $1,003,053 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGeorge Mason University Foundation Inc: $925,605 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDrexel University: $452,503 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDuke University: $391,259 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Rochester: $136,236 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDri Research Foundation: $116,840 over 2y, 13% of budgetThe George Washington University: $116,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Compare Health Effects Institute with peer funders

About Health Effects Institute

How much does Health Effects Institute give?
Health Effects Institute reported 18 itemized grants totaling $5,746,190, out of $7,150,898 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 15 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Health Effects Institute fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Science & Tech (100%).
Who are Health Effects Institute's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: University of Texas ($3.8M), Colorado State University ($1.4M), Trustees of Boston University ($1.3M).
Does Health Effects Institute fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Health Effects Institute based?
Health Effects Institute is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Health Effects Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph