· Private foundation
Hazon Yeshaya Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $81,658 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $128,933 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $47,275 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $73k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Friends of Tiferet Zion Inc. | $18,000 |
| KHT Yeshivat Rechasim Campaign | $15,000 |
| Mesilat Hatorah Trust | $10,000 |
| Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood | $10,000 |
| Mosdot Kehilot Haavrechim, Inc. | $10,000 |
| Yeshivot Yesodot Campaign | $10,000 |
| Kinyanei HaTorah Yeshiva Center | $2,000 |
| Shivat Zion Torah Center | $1,200 |
| American Friends of Sucath David | $1,000 |
| ATIME | $1,000 |
| The Sephardic Food Fund | $825 |
| Lev Shomea Inc. | $800 |
| KHT Kol Yaakov Netivot | $750 |
| Daat Torah Inc | $300 |
| Zichron Amiel 2 | $201 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
47 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFriends of Tiferet Zion Inc.3× · 2023–2025 · $79k
- STSephardic Torah Center Kollel2× · 2023–2024 · $65k
- JSJersey Shore Learning Program2× · 2023–2024 · $36k
Funded once
- BMBet Midrash Gadol Ateret Torahone grant, 2024 · $76k
- BMBet Midrash Gadoi Ateret Torahone grant, 2023 · $72k
- FOFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.
Support of religious schools in Israel
To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.
Charity and education in u.s. and israel
Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.
None
Support for study of torah and chasiddus in ramat shilo, israel
The funding of heichal yerushalayim yeshiva(religious shcool) to facilitate and promote judaic studies.
To solicit, collect and otherwise raise money to support and further the educational work of yeshiva tiferet, a school located in jerusalem, israel, and to generally support, further and advance yeshiva tiferet by all available means and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshiva Meah Shearim Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Sephardic Food Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 212 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Foop Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hazon Yeshaya Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hazon Yeshaya Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.