Skip to content

· Public charity

Hazen Community Development

To further the economic development of the city of hazen by supporting local businesses and promoting new enterprise.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$78kEmployment$61kHealth$42kFood & Nutrition$23kHuman Services$12kCommunity Improvement$12kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $31,873, the rows itemized in this filing. The $150,966 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $119,093 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$830k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAZEN WELDING$14,471
HAZEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$12,000
HAZEN SMILES$5,402
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ENERGY CAPITAL COOPERATIVE CHILD CARE: $6k → 7%ENERGY CAPITAL COOPERATIVE CHILDCARE: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$149k · 5 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$149k
$75k

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HG
    HAZEN GOLF CLUB INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $58k · revenue +22%
  • HC
    HAZEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ANTIONETTE HEIER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $37k · revenue +20%
  • EC
    ENERGY CAPITAL COOPERATIVE CHILD CA
    2× · 2022–2023 · $12k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • HF
    HAZEN FAMILY EYECARE PC
    one grant, 2020 · $22k
  • HP
    HAZEN PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • BB
    BISON BAR AND GRILL
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAZEN GOLF CLUB INC: $57,500 · OtherHAZEN GOLF CLUB INCHAZEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ANTIONETTE HEIER: $36,850 · OtherHAZEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ANTIONETTE HEIERHAZEN FAMILY EYECARE PC: $22,000 · OtherHAZEN FAMILY EYECARE PCHAZEN PARKS AND RECREATION: $20,000 · OtherHAZEN PARKS AND RECREATIONHAZEN WELDING: $14,471 · OtherHAZEN WELDINGBISON BAR AND GRILL: $12,500 · OtherBISON BAR AND GRILLKRYSTA L SELLERS DMD MSD HAZEN PC: $11,313 · OtherKRYSTA L SELLERS DMD MSD HAZEN PCS & G LLC: $10,000 · OtherSUE'S CAFE: $10,000 · OtherSAKAKAWEA MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $30,700 · HealthSAKAKAWEA MEDI…ENERGY CAPITAL COOPERATIVE CHILD CA: $12,442 · Human Services
Other$194,634Health$30,700Human Services$12,442

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAZEN GOLF CLUB INC: $57,500 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetHAZEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ANTIONETTE HEIER: $36,850 over 3y, 22% of budgetSAKAKAWEA MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $30,700 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetENERGY CAPITAL COOPERATIVE CHILD CA: $12,442 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAZEN GOLF CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds HAZEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ANTIONETTE HEIER ↗
  • Who funds SAKAKAWEA MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY CAPITAL COOPERATIVE CHILD CA ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hazen Community Development funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hazen Community Development. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hazen Community Development?

    Find your warmest path to Hazen Community Development through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hazen Community Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph