Skip to content

· Public charity

Haymakers for Hope Inc

The organization's mission is to raise money and awareness for charities that meet the qualifications as described in section 501(c)(3) through amateur athletic events by developing, organizing, and conducting amateur athletic events and related events.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$202k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$6.3MHuman Services$404kRecreation & Sports$284kPhilanthropy$211kYouth Development$193kScience & Tech$91kArts & Culture$83kPublic Safety & Disaster$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 45 grants below total $1,397,693, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,458,582 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $60,889 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $98k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $475k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $825k
$12,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$548k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$201,722
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER$200,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$188,762
FIRST DESCENTS$87,993
ALEX'S LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION$80,863
NICK STRONG FOUNDATION$65,351
BOSTON FIRE CANCER FOUNDATION$40,656
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$31,600
MORE PIG LESS CANCER$31,377
THE LILABEAN FOUNDATION$26,910
CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$26,909
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$25,550
ELLIE FUND$25,264
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA - HOLLINGS CANCER CENTER$24,159
ONE MISSION$20,221
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TOMMY'S PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 7%THE IZZY FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $19k → 6%HAIR WE SHARE: $7k → 6%CHRISTOPHER'S HAVEN: $9k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
SC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 70% of Haymakers for Hope Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 22% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 16%.

Haymakers for Hope Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 35 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
130

Total granted

$4.8M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+43%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $973k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    4× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +162%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    3× · 2017–2021 · $275k · revenue +89%
  • FD
    FIRST DESCENTS
    3× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • FI
    FOR INFINITY AND BEYOND
    one grant, 2024 · $85k
  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $76k · revenue +15%
  • HA
    HOPE AND HEROES
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
4
Pano Koumantaros Cancer Research Fund Inc
Philanthropy
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
6
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
7
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
Oncology Consultants Cancer Research Fun
Health
10
Gastric Cancer Foundation

The gastric cancer foundation helps patients to face their diagnosis with reliable information, tools to navigate the journey, and a compassionate community that truly understands. the foundation funds research initiatives that contribute…

Health
11
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
12
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yale New Haven Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 200 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/73
Grantees still filing
47/73
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $1,054,809 · OtherDANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTEMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $386,065 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $376,758 · OtherSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+131 more: $2,742,412 · Other+131 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,061,052 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $274,698 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTE…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $200,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTE…SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $164,167 · HealthSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+40 more: $843,090 · Health+40 moreFIRST DESCENTS: $149,753 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $18,806 · Recreation & SportsFOR KIDS' SAKE FOUNDATION INC: $18,556 · Recreation & SportsCamp Casco Inc: $12,500 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $10,760 · Recreation & SportsTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $201,722 · Public Safety & DisasterTEAM CORK INC: $25,360 · PhilanthropyGLIOBLASTOMA RESEARCH ORGANIZATION INC: $11,563 · PhilanthropyNicholas Pedone Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $8,829 · PhilanthropyTEAM IMPACT INC: $7,977 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $6,725 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $6,616 · PhilanthropyTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $6,441 · PhilanthropyELLIE FUND INC: $46,104 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $17,163 · EducationSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $18,691 · Human ServicesTHE IZZY FOUNDATION: $12,170 · Human ServicesTommy's Place Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesChristopher's Haven Inc: $8,791 · Human ServicesHAIR WE SHARE: $7,403 · Human Services
Other$4,560,044Health$2,543,007Recreation & Sports$210,375Public Safety & Disaster$201,722Philanthropy$83,511Education$63,267Human Services$57,055

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,061,052 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $274,698 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $201,722 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $164,167 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFIRST DESCENTS: $149,753 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $80,863 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $76,303 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNICK STRONG FOUNDATION INC: $65,351 over 1y, 27% of budgetFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $62,743 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE JULIE FUND INC: $47,504 over 1y, 16% of budgetELLIE FUND INC: $46,104 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION: $45,331 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBOSTON FIREFIGHTERS AND FAMILY CANCER: $40,656 over 1y, 21% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $35,643 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMERON M NEELY FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE INC: $30,645 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC: $29,123 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LILABEAN FOUNDATION INC: $26,910 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTEAM CORK INC: $25,360 over 1y, 56% of budgetULMAN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $24,307 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $20,435 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE MISSION INC: $20,221 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $18,806 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $18,691 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $18,235 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $17,163 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $16,882 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $16,634 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROME MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,772 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $15,007 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALERIE FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $14,563 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Casco Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE IZZY FOUNDATION: $12,170 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetGLIOBLASTOMA RESEARCH ORGANIZATION INC: $11,563 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $11,305 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $10,595 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $10,305 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,246 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $10,240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNicholas Pedone Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $9,542 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT MELANOMA INC: $8,691 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWHY ME INC: $8,370 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHAYESTOUGH FOUNDATION: $8,301 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $8,290 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST DESCENTS ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NICK STRONG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JULIE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ELLIE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON FIREFIGHTERS AND FAMILY CANCER ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GivenGain Foundation USAFL17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GivenGain Foundation USA · Joy In Childhood Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Golf Fights Cancer Inc · Boston Bruins Charitable Foundation Inc · Amica Companies Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · American Express Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haymakers for Hope Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haymakers for Hope Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 220%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Ellie Fund Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Impact Melanoma Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
22get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Haymakers for Hope Inc?

Find your warmest path to Haymakers for Hope Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 200 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haymakers for Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph