Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harvey Ginsberg Charitable Trust

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$3kHealth$3kArts & Culture$2kHousing & Shelter$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kEducation$850Civil Rights$500Religion$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALVARY HOSPITAL$1,000
SAY$1,000
WESTCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER-RESIDENT$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $250 → 22%WESTCHESTER JEWISH CTR: $250 → 9%SAY: $2k → 17%REBUILDING TOGETHER NYC: $500 → 20%THE DREAMYARD PROJECT: $2k → 28%WASHINGTON UNIV IN ST LOUIS: $500 → 11%TEAM WEST KY TORNADO RELIEF: $1k → 14%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $100 → 22%WESTCHESTER CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $250 → 9%SAY: $1k → 17%REBUILDING TOGETHER NYC: $500 → 20%THE DREAMYARD PROJECT: $500 → 28%WESTCHESTER CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $250 → 9%SAY: $750 → 17%MARQUIS STUDIOS: $500 → 20%THE DREAMYARD PROJECT: $500 → 28%WESTCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER-RESIDENT: $250 → 9%SAY: $750 → 17%MARQUIS STUDIOS: $500 → 20%THE DREAMYARD PROJECT: $250 → 28%SAY: $250 → 17%CALVARY HOSPITAL: $1k → 28%NY STEM CELL FOUNDATION: $250 → 17%NY STEM CELL FDN: $500 → 17%NY STEM CELL FDN: $250 → 17%HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12k · 7 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$12k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+6%

Still filing today

57%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER NYC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +40%
  • MS
    MARQUIS STUDIOS LTD
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +13%
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $350 · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • TW
    TEAM WEST KY TORNADO RELIEF
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue -48%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
9
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
10
New York Institute of Technology

New york institute of technology (nyit) offers various degree programs, including undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees, in more than 50 fields of study, including architecture and design; arts and sciences; (continued on…

Education
11
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights First and the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAY — $4,700 · OtherSAYTEAM WEST KY TORNADO RELIEF — $1,000 · OtherTEAM WEST KY TORNADO RELIEFNY STEM CELL FDN — $1,000 · OtherNY STEM CELL FDNWESTCHESTER CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $500 · OtherWESTCHESTER CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC+2 more — $500 · Other+2 moreTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INCMARQUIS STUDIOS LTD — $1,000 · Arts & CultureMARQUIS STUDIOS LTDCALVARY HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 · HealthCALVARY HO…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $500 · HealthTHE MICHAE…REBUILDING TOGETHER NYC — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $500 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $350 · EducationHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $500 · International
Other$7,700Arts & Culture$4,000Health$1,500Housing & Shelter$1,000Education$850International$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC — $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NYC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARQUIS STUDIOS LTD — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALVARY HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harvey Ginsberg Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph