Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harry and Anne Mestel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$50kEducation$41kFood & Nutrition$41kHuman Services$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kScience & Tech$13k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,241
Median grant
4
States reached
$543k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT$5,000
AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK$3,750
AMERICAN RED CROSS$3,750
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,250
CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$2,241
AMERICAN COMMITTE FOR THE WEIZMAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$2,000
WALSH UNIVERSITY$2,000
THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
OHIO FOUND OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATI: $2k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $11k → 13%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 13%OHIO FOUND OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $2k → 15%WEIZMAN INSTITUE OF SCIENCE: $2k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $7k → 13%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 13%OHIO FOUND OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $2k → 15%WEIZMAN INSTITUE OF SCIENCE: $2k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $7k → 13%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 13%OHIO FOUND OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $2k → 15%WEIZMAN INSTITUE OF SCIENCE: $2k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $4k → 17%AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $4k → 13%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 13%OHIO FOUND OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $1k → 15%AMERICAN COMMITTE FOR THE WEIZMAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $2k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $4k → 17%AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $4k → 13%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 13%OHIO FOUND OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $1k → 15%AMERICAN COMMITTE FOR THE WEIZMAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $1k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $4k → 17%AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $4k → 13%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 13%AMERICAN COMMITTE FOR THE WEIZMAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $1k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2k → 13%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 13%WEIZMAN INSTITUE OF SCIENCE: $1k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2k → 13%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 13%AMERICAN COMMITTE FOR THE WEIZMAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $1k → 17%AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2k → 13%AMERICAN COMMITTE FOR THE WEIZMAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $1k → 17%WALSH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%WALSH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%WALSH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%WALSH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$224k · 10 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$224k
$4k

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +43%
  • DV
    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +41%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC: $41,000 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INCCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $16,492 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLOHIO FOUND OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $12,500 · OtherOHIO FOUND OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGESWEIZMAN INSTITUE OF SCIENCE: $7,000 · OtherWEIZMAN INSTITUE OF SCIENCEST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA: $3,802 · OtherAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $41,345 · Food & NutritionAKRON-CANTON REGIONA…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,242 · Human ServicesAmerican National Re…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $32,688 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $13,899 · Public Safety & DisasterWalsh University Inc: $12,500 · EducationAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $6,000 · International
Other$80,794Food & Nutrition$41,345Human Services$40,242Health$32,688Public Safety & Disaster$13,899Education$12,500International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $41,345 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC: $41,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,242 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $32,688 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $13,899 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $12,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harry and Anne Mestel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harry and Anne Mestel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harry and Anne Mestel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph