· Private foundation
Harold D Jones for Charities
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF TITUSVILLE | $28,500 |
| BENSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY INC | $28,500 |
| YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION | $4,455 |
| TITUSVILLE AREA HOSPITAL | $3,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- UWUnited Way of the Titusville Region4× · 2018–2024 · $136k · revenue +6%
- TATITUSVILLE AREA HOSPITAL4× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +96%
- ACASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF TITUSVILLE2× · 2023–2025 · $39k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- TATitusville Alumni Associationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +72%
- CCCRAWFORD COUNTY CASA INCone grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +4%
- TRTITUSVILLE RENAISSANCE INCone grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The young women's christian association of lubbock is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.
Dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women & promoting peace, justice, freedom, & dignity for all.
To build a worldwide fellowship of individuals through physical, social, mental and spiritual activities
Eliminating racism and empowering women.
Ywca allentown is on a mission to eliminate racism, empower women, stand up for social justice, help families, and strengthen communities.
To promote economic development in the Titusville, Pennsylvania geographic area.
Efficiently allocate and organize donations to local charitable organizations.
To provide library servies to the tidioute area
Public lending library
How this is measured
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Helmer Rabild Tuw for Charities · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Harold D Jones for Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold D Jones for Charities. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Harold D Jones for Charities’ filings →