Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harold Abel and Iris T Abel Family Foundation C/O Lawrence Abel

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$295kPhilanthropy$200kReligion$56kArts & Culture$39kCivil Rights$20kCrime & Legal$11kHousing & Shelter$10kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $103k
$12,453
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$35,000
VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS$30,655
LAURELLEN PRODUCTIONS$15,000
TEMPLE BETH ZION-BETH ISRAEL$12,453
PRISM GAY MEN AND ALLIES$10,000
THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$555k · 8 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$555k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-28%
+74%

Still filing today

13%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationReligionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $270k
  • VO
    VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $166k
  • AI
    ADATH ISRAEL
    5× · 2019–2023 · $32k

Funded once

  • DI
    DIALOGUE INSTITUTE DBA JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +160%
  • TE
    THE EMPOWERMENT PLANgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +30%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
University of Judaism Foundation
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

7
Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas

As the voice of the jewish community, to protect jewish interests & promote jewish ideals.

8
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
9
Philadelphia Jewish Film and Media

Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…

Human Services
10
The Foundation for the Preservation of the History of the Jewish People in
Arts & Culture
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holocaust Memorial Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Empowerment Plan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY — $270,250 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS — $166,295 · OtherVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONSADATH ISRAEL — $32,420 · OtherADATH ISRAELTEMPLE BETHZION-BETH ISRAEL — $23,253 · OtherJEWSIH NATIONAL FUND — $21,600 · OtherPRISM GAY MEN AND ALLIES — $20,000 · Other+6 more — $31,800 · Other+6 moreDIALOGUE INSTITUTE DBA JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES — $20,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $5,000 · EducationHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Arts & CultureWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $3,580 · Arts & CultureLAURELLEN PRODUCTIONS — $15,000 · ReligionJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $12,150 · PhilanthropyTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN — $10,000 · Human Services
Other$565,618Education$25,000Arts & Culture$18,580Religion$15,000Philanthropy$12,150Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDIALOGUE INSTITUTE DBA JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES — $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetLAURELLEN PRODUCTIONS — $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $12,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDETROIT YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $3,580 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIALOGUE INSTITUTE DBA JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES
  • Who funds LAURELLEN PRODUCTIONS
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN
  • Who funds DETROIT YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
  • Who funds WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harold Abel and Iris T Abel Family Foundation C/O Lawrence Abel funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph