Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harold A and Marilyn Kay Andresen Charitable Trust DTD 3/20/01

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$88k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$750kFood & Nutrition$59kEducation$32kReligion$30kRecreation & Sports$15kPhilanthropy$11kHealth$7kEnvironment$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $42,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $87,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $45,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$250k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Savanna Food Pantry$16,800
Shannon Lanark Food Pantry$8,160
Helping Hands Food Pantry$3,840
First Lutheran Church of Chadwick$3,600
Bread of Life Lutheran Church$3,600
City of Fulton - Andresen Nature Center$1,500
Heifer International Foundation$1,000
Muscular Dystrophy Association$1,000
Lutheran Social Services of Illinois$1,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$1,000
North Carolina Lions Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $746k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CARROLL COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $746k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$82k · 8 repeat orgs$786k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against -41% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$82k
$776k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-41%

Still filing today

50%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +1%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +59%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • CC
    Carroll County Senior Services Organization Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $746k · revenue -41% · 42% of their budget
  • CL
    Chadwick Lions Club
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • SF
    Shannon Food Pantry
    one grant, 2023 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Carroll County Senior Services Organization Inc — $746,467 · Human ServicesCarroll County Senior Services Organization Inc+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesSAVANNA FOOD PANTRY — $33,600 · OtherSAVANNA FOOD P…Chadwick Lions Club — $15,000 · OtherChadwick Lions…First Lutheran Church of Chadwick — $14,500 · OtherFirst Lutheran…Bread of Life Lutheran Church — $10,800 · OtherBread of Life …HELPING HANDS FOOD PANTRY — $9,180 · OtherHELPING HANDS …Shannon Food Pantry — $8,160 · OtherShannon Food P…SHANNON LANARK FOOD PANTRY — $8,160 · OtherSHANNON LANARK…City of Fulton - Andresen Nature Center — $4,000 · Other+4 more — $9,100 · Other+4 moreMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $3,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $3,000 · HealthHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · International
Human Services$747,467Other$112,500Health$6,500International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCarroll County Senior Services Organization Inc — $746,467 over 1y, 42% of budgetSAVANNA FOOD PANTRY — $33,600 over 2y, 22% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA LIONS INCORPORATED — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Carroll County Senior Services Organization Inc
  • Who funds SAVANNA FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA LIONS INCORPORATED
  • Who funds HEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harold A and Marilyn Kay Andresen Charitable Trust DTD 3/20/01 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph