Skip to content
Harary Family Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Harary Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$414k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$312k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$634kHuman Services$253kFood & Nutrition$42kPhilanthropy$38kInternational$29kHealth$16kEducation$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $77k
  • $250k+1 grant · $312k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAGEN DAVID YESHIVA$312,000
YESHIVA OF FLATBUSH$34,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$12,000
MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER$11,300
THE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTER$10,000
SHUVI NAFSHI FOUNDATION INC$10,000
JACOB S KASSIN HESSED FUND$7,200
SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY CENTER$6,000
SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND$6,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHAR$5,200
EDMUND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $300 → 14%THE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTER: $20k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%THE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTER: $18k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%THE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%THE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 11%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $27k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $18k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $18k → 20%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $11k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$931k · 29 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
18

Total granted

$931k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+36%

Still filing today

48%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthReligionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $63k · revenue +82%
  • TS
    THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER
    4× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +186%
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • SO
    SYNAGOGUE OF DEAL
    one grant, 2021 · $26k
  • CR
    CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue +36%
  • PA
    PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
International Sephardic Educational & Cultural Center in Jerusalem

The sec is dedicated to strengthening jewish indentiy for youth and young adults, and to building a new generation of spiritual and community leaders. from our historic campus in the old city of jerusalem to our various diaspora branches,…

Religion
3
Congregation Beth-El Sephardic Center of Jamaica Estates

Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution

Religion
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
6
University of Judaism Foundation
—
7
Magen David of Manhattan

The organization maintains a jewish community center to provide social and educational services to the jewish community in new york city, new york.

Religion
8
Sephardic Foundation for Torah Studies Inc

To promote, encourage, foster and advance the teaching and study of the sephardic jewish religion.

Education
9
Foundation for Sephardic Studies

Foundation has been dedicated to enhance and promoting the culture of the sephardic jewish communities.

—
10
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
11
Smach Zevilin of Ny Inc

To provide financial aid and assistance to the poor, sick & disabled people, and monetary support to needy families in time of need.

Philanthropy
12
Society for the Welfare of Israeli Underprivileged Gifted Children

To provide educational assistance to underprivileged gifted children in israel.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moise Safra Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ilan High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $359,000 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAHYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $116,200 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHIndividual grant recipient: $37,105 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSYNAGOGUE OF DEAL: $26,000 · Other+33 more: $94,143 · Other+33 moreSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $62,501 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY …THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $58,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CH…MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $11,300 · Human ServicesMOISE SAFRA CO…+1 more: $600 · Human ServicesSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $120,167 · Youth DevelopmentSEPHARDIC COM…THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $42,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $38,100 · PhilanthropyShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $20,000 · ReligionCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $17,200 · Religion+1 more: $100 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $23,200 · InternationalYAD DAVID INC: $10,000 · International+1 more: $400 · International
Other$632,448Human Services$132,401Youth Development$120,167Food & Nutrition$42,000Philanthropy$38,100Religion$37,300International$33,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $120,167 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $62,501 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $58,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $42,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $38,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $23,200 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $17,200 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $11,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $10,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYAD DAVID INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGrace Foundation of New York: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUSO OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC ↗
  • Who funds MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YAD DAVID INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Grace Foundation of New York ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Samuel & Mollie Jemal…Isaac & Marjorie Gind…Chehebar Family Found…Jewish Communal FundThe Ralph S Gindi Fam…Jack Adjmi Family Fou…Ralph J Harary Founda…David M Levy Family F…Haddad Brands Family …The Mamiye Foundation…Albert & Melissa Sutt…E R G Foundation
Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem RealtyNY26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · David M Levy Family Foundation · Haddad Brands Family Foundation · The Mamiye Foundation Inc · Albert & Melissa Sutton Foundation · E R G Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harary Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harary Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harary Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Harary Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harary Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home