Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hanson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$317k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Public Benefit$1.3MArts & Culture$205kEducation$130kHousing & Shelter$60kHuman Services$60kInternational$30kEnvironment$25kSocial Science$5k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $212k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Heritage Foundation$152,000
The Leadership Institute$60,000
Media Research Center$25,000
Turning Point USA$15,000
Judicial Watch$10,000
St Vincent De Paul Village$10,000
Hillsdale College$10,000
Navy Seal Foundation$10,000
San Diego Armed Services YMCA$10,000
Freedom Alliance$5,000
Committee For A Constructive Tomorr$5,000
The Claremont Institute$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Turning Point USA: $15k → 11%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $15k → 10%San Diego Armed Services YMCA: $10k → 11%Judicial Watch: $10k → 14%Hillsdale College: $10k → 14%The Leadership Institute: $60k → 7%Media Research Center: $25k → 9%Navy Seal Foundation: $10k → 10%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $15k → 10%San Diego Armed Services YMCA: $10k → 11%Judicial Watch: $10k → 14%Hillsdale College: $10k → 14%The Leadership Institute: $60k → 7%Media Research Center: $25k → 9%Navy Seal Foundation: $10k → 10%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $15k → 10%San Diego Armed Services YMCA: $10k → 11%Judicial Watch: $10k → 14%Hillsdale College: $10k → 14%The Leadership Institute: $50k → 7%Media Research Center: $25k → 9%Navy Seal Foundation: $10k → 10%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $15k → 10%San Diego Armed Services YMCA: $10k → 11%Hillsdale College: $10k → 14%The Leadership Institute: $50k → 7%Media Research Center: $25k → 9%Navy Seal Foundation: $10k → 10%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $15k → 10%San Diego Armed Services YMCA: $10k → 11%Hillsdale College: $10k → 14%The Leadership Institute: $50k → 7%Media Research Center: $25k → 9%Navy Seal Foundation: $10k → 10%San Diego Armed Services YMCA: $10k → 11%The Heritage Foundation: $152k → 14%The Leadership Institute: $35k → 7%Media Research Center: $20k → 9%Navy Seal Foundation: $10k → 10%St Vincent De Paul Village: $10k → 11%St Vincent De Paul Village: $10k → 11%The Heritage Foundation: $152k → 14%St Vincent De Paul Village: $10k → 11%St Vincent De Paul Village: $10k → 11%The Heritage Foundation: $152k → 14%The Heritage Foundation: $152k → 14%The Heritage Foundation: $142k → 14%The Heritage Foundation: $122k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 10 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitArts & CultureEducationReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $872k · revenue +12%
  • IS
    INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +45%
  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    one grant, 2025 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • CF
    COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
4
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
5
American Press Institute Inc

American press institute acts as a scout on the frontier of technology and audience behavior to identify where change is occurring and helps news organizations learn how to implement and scale that change successfully so they have a…

Arts & Culture
6
International Republican Institute

Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Institute for Strategic Dialogue-Us

Isd-us is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to defending democracy and individual rights against threats to public safety and national security. isd-us is at the forefront of analyzing and innovating solutions…

Education
9
The Institute of World Politics

The institute of world politics is a graduate school of national security and international affairs, dedicated to developing leaders with a sound understanding of international realities and the ethical conduct of statecraft, based on…

International
10
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
11
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
12
National Institute for Public Policy Inc

The institute works as a public education organization that focuses on a wide spectrum of rapidly evolving foreign policy and international issues.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $872,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATIONLeadership Institute: $305,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute+1 more: $40,000 · Public BenefitMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $145,000 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESEARC…NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOU…San Diego Armed Services YMCA: $60,000 · OtherTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $30,000 · OtherCommittee for a Constructive Tomorr: $25,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INC: $15,000 · OtherCOMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW: $5,000 · OtherINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $75,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $55,000 · EducationST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $60,000 · ReligionFREEDOM ALLIANCE: $30,000 · International
Public Benefit$1,217,000Arts & Culture$205,000Other$135,000Education$130,000Religion$60,000International$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $872,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Institute: $305,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $145,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hanson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hanson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hanson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph