Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Michigan · Public charity

Handicapper's Information Council Patient Equipment Locker Inc

Provide transportation services to the elderly and disabled as well as aiding cancer patients with the cost of prescriptions, transportation and clinical services.

$356k
Granted FY2017
3
Itemized grants FY2017
2
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2017
$249k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2017
$80,387
Largest grant, FY2017
$93,795
States reached, FY2017
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
City of Alma$93,7951n/a
Pardee Cancer Treatment Fund of Gratiot County$80,3871n/a

Compare Handicapper's Information Council Patient Equipment Locker Inc with peer funders

About Handicapper's Information Council Patient Equipment Locker Inc

How much does Handicapper's Information Council Patient Equipment Locker Inc give?
Handicapper's Information Council Patient Equipment Locker Inc reported 3 itemized grants totaling $249,447, out of $355,573 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Handicapper's Information Council Patient Equipment Locker Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Public Benefit (38%), Health (32%), Philanthropy (30%).
Who are Handicapper's Information Council Patient Equipment Locker Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: City of Alma ($94k), Pardee Cancer Treatment Fund of Gratiot County ($80k).
Where is Handicapper's Information Council Patient Equipment Locker Inc based?
Handicapper's Information Council Patient Equipment Locker Inc is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home