Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hagopian Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$12kReligion$12kHuman Services$6kArts & Culture$6kCivil Rights$3kEducation$2kAnimals$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$223k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,750
Armenia Tree Project$1,000
Tekeyan Cultural Association$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
The Armenian Relief Society (ARS) Tzolig Chapter of Greater Detroit$1,000
AGBU Alex & Marie Manoogian School$1,000
Nepal Cleft and Burn Center$500
St John's Armenian Church$500
Armenian National Committee of America$500
Armenia Eyecare Project$500
Last Chance Corral$200
Individual grant recipient$100
St Sarkis Armenian Apostolic Church$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%BIG CAT RESCUE: $50 → 13%Leader Dogs for the Blind: $50 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
RI
CA
UT
VA
KS
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45k · 12 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
27

Total granted

$45k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

42%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +8%
  • AR
    ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY OF EASTERN USA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +94%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • AA
    AREMNIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • CC
    CULTURAL COUNCIL OF BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • CO
    City of Farmington Hills - The Hawk Community Center
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
3
Animal Diplomacy

Supporting and assisting with rescue, sheltering, spay/neuter, and rehoming of cats and dogs in needy developing countries. Our current exclusive focus is on Egypt and the Egyptian Society for Mercy to Animals.

Animals
4
Forgotten Animals Foundation

prevention of cruelty to animals

Animals
5
Global Arm Foundation

Education about armenia & caucasu region

Philanthropy
6
Armenian Sports Hall of Fame
—
7
Armenian Center for Contemporary Experimental Art Inc

To promote armenian contemporary experimental art

Arts & Culture
8
Last Chance for Animals

Dedicated to ending animal abuse and exploitation through education, public outreach and investigations.

Animals
9
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
10
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
11
The Afghan Stray Animal League

To support and oversee a free clinic and shelter for stray dogs and cats and working donkeys and horses in afghanistan. provide vaccines, sterilization and medical treatment at no cost

Animals
12
Cultural Impact Foundation Inc

Humans are endowed with innate creative abilities; we have formed civilizations and societies, framed laws, built architectural marvels and created cultural masterpieces. it is our creative abilities that have allowed us to produce…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Armenian Assembly of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tufenkian Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $22,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOHNS ARMENIAN CHURCH: $5,500 · OtherST JOHNS ARMENIAN CHURCHAREMNIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA: $2,500 · OtherTekeyan Cultural Association: $2,400 · OtherCULTURAL COUNCIL OF BIRMINGHAM: $2,000 · OtherAGBU ALEX & MARIE MANOOGIAN: $2,000 · OtherA G B U ALEX AND MARIE MANOOGIAN SCHOOL: $2,000 · Other+18 more: $12,955 · Other+18 moreARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC: $4,100 · InternationalARMENIAN ASSEMBL…ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY OF EASTERN USA INC: $1,500 · InternationalARMENIAN RELIEF …ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · InternationalARMENIAN RELIEF …CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF: $1,000 · InternationalCHILDREN OF ARME…FUND FOR ARMENIAN RELIEF INC: $1,000 · InternationalFUND FOR ARMENIA…NEPAL CLEFT & BURN CENTER INC: $500 · InternationalARMENIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE OF AMERICA: $500 · InternationalLAST CHANCE CORRAL: $800 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals International: $350 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $100 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50 · AnimalsPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $50 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $50 · AnimalsWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,270 · Human ServicesBIG CAT RESCUE CORP: $50 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $50 · Human ServicesARMENIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 · EducationTUFENKIAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ARMENIAN EYECARE PROJECT: $500 · Health
Other$51,605International$9,600Animals$1,400Human Services$1,370Education$1,000Philanthropy$1,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC: $4,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY OF EASTERN USA INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,270 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUFENKIAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR ARMENIAN RELIEF INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAST CHANCE CORRAL: $800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetARMENIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $375 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CAT RESCUE CORP: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWarrior Dog Foundation: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY OF EASTERN USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TUFENKIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR ARMENIAN RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds LAST CHANCE CORRAL ↗
  • Who funds THE ARMENIAN EYECARE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NEPAL CLEFT & BURN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals International ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG CAT RESCUE CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bedrosian FoundationPA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bedrosian Foundation · Edward & Helen Mardigian Foundation · Zartarian Foundation · Leon and Marion Semonian Charitable Trust · John Mirak Foundation · Sami & Annie Totah Family Foundation · Robert a Semonian Charitable Trust · Cherchian Family Foundation Inc · Levon & Claudia Nazarian Family Foundation Inc (Levon Nazarian Fd'N) · Vartkess & Rita Balian Family Foundation Inc · The Parsekian Foundation Inc · The Armen and Gloria Hampar Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hagopian Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hagopian Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hagopian Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph