Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ha& Lm Walsh Tr-Scholarship

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$4k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of Ha& Lm Walsh Tr-Scholarship’s FY2023 grant dollars went to The Rhode Island Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Ha& Lm Walsh Tr-Scholarship named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $12k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
3
’18
4
’19
2
’20
5
’21
3
’22
5
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$232kHealth$43kHuman Services$22kEducation$8kArts & Culture$250
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$3,500
SOUTH COUNTY HOSPITAL$3,500
JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND$500
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$250
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$250
AMERICAN MUSICAL AND DRAMATIC ACADEMY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $250 → 10%UMASS-AMHERST: $250 → 12%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $250 → 16%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $250 → 22%THE SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 14%AMERICAN MUSICAL AND DRAMATIC ACADEMY: $250 → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $250 → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $250 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $250 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $1k → 7%ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY: $250 → 7%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF RHODE ISLAND: $500 → 7%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $250 → 14%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 12%SAVANNAH COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN: $250 → 16%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $250 → 13%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $250 → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $250 → 9%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $250 → 10%JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER: $4k → 16%THE SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $750 → 7%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF RHODE ISLAND: $250 → 7%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $250 → 14%JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER: $4k → 16%THE SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $750 → 7%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $250 → 14%JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER: $4k → 16%THE SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $500 → 7%THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $232k → 14%JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER: $3k → 16%THE SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $250 → 7%JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER: $3k → 16%THE SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%SOUTH COUNTY HOSPITAL: $4k → 7%JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER: $3k → 16%THE SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%SOUTH COUNTY HOSPITAL: $4k → 7%JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER: $3k → 16%SOUTH COUNTY HOSPITAL: $4k → 7%SOUTH COUNTY HOSPITAL: $3k → 7%SOUTH COUNTY HOSPITAL: $3k → 7%SOUTH COUNTY HOSPITAL: $3k → 7%SOUTH COUNTY HOSPITAL: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
RI
UT
VA
DE
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70k · 6 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$70k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+99%

Still filing today

33%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $22k
  • JD
    JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $22k · revenue -12%
  • SC
    SOUTH COUNTY HOSPITAL
    7× · 2017–2023 · $22k

Funded once

  • SC
    Savannah College of Art and DesignIncgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue +99%
  • U
    UMASS-AMHERST
    one grant, 2019 · $250
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT
    one grant, 2018 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
4
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
7
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
8
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
9
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
10
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
11
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
12
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University; the most unlike its peers is Amda Inc (American Musical and Dramatic Academy). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $232,313 · PhilanthropyTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY: $21,672 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSOUTH COUNTY HOSPITAL: $21,672 · OtherSOUTH COUNTY HOSPI…UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $3,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF RHOD…+10 more: $3,250 · Other+10 moreJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $21,672 · HealthUniversity of Miami: $250 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $250 · EducationSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $250 · EducationROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY: $250 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $250 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $250 · EducationBROWN UNIVERSITY: $500 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$232,313Other$49,844Health$21,672Education$1,500Community Improvement$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $232,313 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $21,672 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMDA INC (AMERICAN MUSICAL AND DRAMATIC ACADEMY): $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Savannah College of Art and DesignInc ↗
  • Who funds AMDA INC (AMERICAN MUSICAL AND DRAMATIC ACADEMY) ↗
  • Who funds ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ha& Lm Walsh Tr-Scholarship funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ha& Lm Walsh Tr-Scholarship. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc: 35% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ha& Lm Walsh Tr-Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph