Skip to content
H L Snyder Medical Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

H L Snyder Medical Foundation

Support cancer and other medical research, contributing to local medical charitable efforts and providing scholarships and grants to deserving local students pursuing a career in a medically-related field.

$397k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MHealth$1.2MPublic Benefit$63kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kHuman Services$21k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $276,401, the rows itemized in this filing. The $396,605 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $120,204 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $173k
$10,340
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$103,785
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$69,190
KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOC$34,595
CITY OF WINFIELD$28,282
WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIO$10,340
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER IN COWLEY C$8,857
THE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE$8,678
THE CAPPER FOUNDATION$7,287
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 465$5,387
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $86k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $129k → 8%LEPROSY FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOC: $35k → 15%WILLIAM NEWTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $50k → 16%THE KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT: $30k → 20%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $72k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $108k → 8%KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOC: $35k → 15%WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIO: $50k → 16%THE KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT: $30k → 20%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $70k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $105k → 8%KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOC: $35k → 15%WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIO: $50k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $70k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $105k → 8%KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOC: $30k → 15%WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIO: $50k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $70k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $105k → 8%KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOC: $30k → 15%WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIO: $50k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $69k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $104k → 8%KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOC: $25k → 15%CITY OF WINFIELD: $36k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $60k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $90k → 8%KU ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION: $18k → 15%WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIO: $30k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $60k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $90k → 8%WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIO: $30k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $50k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $75k → 8%CITY OF WINFIELD: $28k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%CITY OF WINFIELD: $22k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%KANSAS VETERANS HOME: $19k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%CITY OF WINFIELD: $19k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%THE CITY OF WINFIELD: $17k → 16%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%CITY OF WINFIELD: $16k → 16%CITY OF WINFIELD: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 9 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$1.6M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+22%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $607k · revenue +162%
  • WN
    William Newton Healthcare Foundation Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +304% · 25% of their budget
  • TK
    The Kansas University Endowment Association
    8× · 2017–2025 · $218k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
6
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
9
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000,292 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV…The Kansas University Endowment Association: $217,521 · EducationThe Kansas University Endowment AssociationKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $94,458 · EducationKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $8,678 · EducationDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $606,862 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncWilliam Newton Healthcare Foundation Inc: $290,360 · HealthWilliam Newton Healthcare Foundation I…CITY OF WINFIELD: $196,444 · OtherCITY OF WINFIELDKANSAS ATHLETICS INC: $89,577 · OtherKANSAS ATHLETICS…WINFIELD USD 465: $36,852 · OtherWINFIELD USD 465CAPPER FOUNDATION: $33,971 · OtherCAPPER FOUNDATIO…COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER IN COWLEY COUNTY INC: $23,662 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH…AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC: $50,000 · International
Education$1,320,949Health$897,222Other$380,506International$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000,292 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $606,862 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Newton Healthcare Foundation Inc: $290,360 over 7y, 25% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $217,521 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $94,458 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAPPER FOUNDATION: $33,971 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER IN COWLEY COUNTY INC: $23,662 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $8,678 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds William Newton Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPPER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER IN COWLEY COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Legacy a Regional Com…
Legacy a Regional Community FoundationKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Legacy a Regional Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H L Snyder Medical Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H L Snyder Medical Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on H L Snyder Medical’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home