Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Gsma Mobile for Development Foundation Inc

Gsma mobile for development foundation, inc was created for the purpose of developing and engaging in projects that utilize mobile communications to relieve the poor, the distressed, and the under-privileged.

$3.1M
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

International$1.7MEnvironment$1.6M
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $109,536 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,065,528 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,955,992 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $73k
$73,065
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EarthSpark International$73,065
OmniVis Inc$36,471
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%American Refugee Committee: $142k → 11%OmniVis Inc: $199k → 7%POWERHIVE INC: $117k → 10%DLIGHT DESIGN INC: $204k → 10%Sesame Workshop: $337k → 17%MATONTINE INC: $182k → 28%WIST INC: $140k → 14%ECOENERGYFINANCE: $11k → 14%Telephone System International Inc: $60k → 6%Mobile Accord Inc (TA GeoPoll): $111k → 12%American Refugee Committee: $91k → 11%OmniVis Inc: $179k → 7%DLIGHT DESIGN INC: $38k → 10%Sesame Workshop: $63k → 17%MATONTINE INC: $155k → 28%WIST INC: $73k → 14%EarthSpark International: $161k → 14%Mobile Accord Inc (TA GeoPoll): $91k → 12%American Refugee Committee: $54k → 11%OmniVis Inc: $36k → 7%SAFE WATER NETWORK: $249k → 17%MATONTINE INC: $93k → 28%WIST INC: $64k → 14%EarthSpark International: $151k → 14%SAFE WATER NETWORK: $140k → 17%WIST INC: $19k → 14%EarthSpark International: $73k → 14%SAFE WATER NETWORK: $85k → 17%SAFE WATER NETWORK: $66k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $4.2M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$2.0M · 49% · 26 grants

Stated purpose: Ecosystem Accelerator

South Asia$1.5M · 35% · 19 grants

Stated purpose: Ecosystem Accelerator

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$526k · 13% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: Ecosystem Accelerator

East Asia and the Pacific$127k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Ecosystem Accelerator

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 50% of Gsma Mobile for Development Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Gsma Mobile for Development Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 9 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$3.2M
$188k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalEnvironmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    SAFE WATER NETWORK
    4× · 2018–2021 · $540k · revenue +110%
  • EI
    EARTHSPARK INTERNATIONAL CORP
    3× · 2021–2023 · $385k · revenue +690%
  • A
    ALIGHT
    3× · 2020–2022 · $288k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • PI
    POWERHIVE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $117k
  • TS
    Telephone System International Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • E
    ECOENERGYFINANCE
    one grant, 2017 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MATONTINE INC — $430,244 · OtherMATONTINE INCOmniVis Inc — $414,157 · OtherOmniVis IncWIST INC — $296,137 · OtherWIST INCDLIGHT DESIGN INC — $241,755 · OtherDLIGHT DESIGN INCMobile Accord Inc (TA GeoPoll) — $202,080 · OtherMobile Accord Inc (TA GeoPoll)POWERHIVE INC — $117,159 · OtherPOWERHIVE INCTelephone System International Inc — $59,748 · Other+1 more — $11,043 · OtherEARTHSPARK INTERNATIONAL CORP — $384,785 · InternationalEARTHSPARK INTERNATION…ALIGHT — $287,569 · InternationalALIGHTSAFE WATER NETWORK — $539,565 · EnvironmentSAFE WATER NETWORKSESAME WORKSHOP — $400,646 · Arts & CultureSESAME WORKSH…
Other$1,772,323International$672,354Environment$539,565Arts & Culture$400,646

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAFE WATER NETWORK — $539,565 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetSESAME WORKSHOP — $400,646 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEARTHSPARK INTERNATIONAL CORP — $384,785 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetALIGHT — $287,569 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAFE WATER NETWORK
  • Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP
  • Who funds EARTHSPARK INTERNATIONAL CORP
  • Who funds ALIGHT

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gsma Mobile for Development Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gsma Mobile for Development Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Gsma Mobile for Development Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $4.2M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph