Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Griffiss Institute Inc

The griffiss institute aims to develop the next generation of stem talent and defense technologies that will strengthen u.s.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Science & Tech$998kCommunity Improvement$278kArts & Culture$241kEducation$234kYouth Development$135kHealth$108kPhilanthropy$105kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $590,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,220,250 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $629,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $213k
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$32,500
Median grant
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DRONE CITY LLC$280,000
ARTIFICIAL BRAIN TECH INC$107,500
Individual grant recipient$105,000
Individual grant recipient$32,500
TRIARII AI LLC SEAN SMITH$32,500
UTAH STEM FOUNDATION$15,000
UGIFT529$10,750
ARONETICS$7,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$778k · 4 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
19

Total granted

$778k
$1.0M

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $296k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DRONE CITY LLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $345k
  • US
    UTAH STEM FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $223k · revenue +31% · 35% of their budget
  • CI
    CYBERSPORA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $110k

Funded once

  • TI
    THERMOAI INC
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • B
    BLOOMOPTIX
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • EE
    EMPOWER EQUITY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $160k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field
03the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20192025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DRONE CITY LLC — $345,000 · OtherDRONE CITY LLCTHERMOAI INC — $200,000 · OtherTHERMOAI INCBLOOMOPTIX — $199,633 · OtherBLOOMOPTIXEMPOWER EQUITY INC — $160,000 · OtherEMPOWER EQUITY INCCYBERSPORA INC — $110,000 · OtherCYBERSPORA INCBOSONQ PSI CORP — $110,000 · OtherBOSONQ PSI CORPARTIFICIAL BRAIN TECH INC — $107,500 · OtherARTIFICIAL BRAIN TECH INCPaterson Aerospace Systems Corp — $105,000 · OtherPaterson Aerospace Systems CorpIndividual grant recipient — $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPREVISION CORP — $100,000 · OtherVISTEX COMPOSITES — $100,000 · Other+17 more — $250,362 · Other+17 moreUTAH STEM FOUNDATION INC — $223,000 · EducationUTAH STEM F…
Other$1,892,495Education$223,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUTAH STEM FOUNDATION INC — $223,000 over 2y, 35% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH STEM FOUNDATION INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Griffiss Institute Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph