Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Massachusetts · Private foundation

Gregory and Itsuko Herrema Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$882k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Gregory and Itsuko Herrema Charitable Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Virginia Tech Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2024
$881,815
Largest grant, FY2024
$881,815
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$3.2M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$2.1M

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2024.

VA TECH FOUNDATION$881,815

Compare Gregory and Itsuko Herrema Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About Gregory and Itsuko Herrema Charitable Foundation

How much does Gregory and Itsuko Herrema Charitable Foundation give?
Gregory and Itsuko Herrema Charitable Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $881,815 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Gregory and Itsuko Herrema Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Does Gregory and Itsuko Herrema Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Gregory and Itsuko Herrema Charitable Foundation based?
Gregory and Itsuko Herrema Charitable Foundation is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gregory and Itsuko Herrema’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home