Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Texas · Public charity

Greenwood Gun Club

Provide facilities for members to proactice shooting and compete in gun and archery competition, and provide gun safety programs.

$9k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
Organizations funded FY2021
0%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2021
$9,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$9,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2020 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
1
Total assets, FY2021
$1.3M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 0% of the organizations Greenwood Gun Club funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20211$9k0%
FY20201$20kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Youth Development$29k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Texas State Rifle Association Foundation Inc$28,50025%

Compare Greenwood Gun Club with peer funders

About Greenwood Gun Club

How much does Greenwood Gun Club give?
Greenwood Gun Club reported 1 grants totaling $9,000 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2021.
What does Greenwood Gun Club fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2021, its largest causes are Youth Development (100%).
Who are Greenwood Gun Club's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2021: Texas State Rifle Association Foundation Inc ($29k).
Does Greenwood Gun Club fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Greenwood Gun Club based?
Greenwood Gun Club is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greenwood Gun Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home