Skip to content

· Public charity

Greentownorg Inc

To help innovators with physical products navigate the journey from prototype through to commercialization and impact at scale.

$121k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Science & Tech$153kCommunity Improvement$135kEnvironment$18kHealth$10kFood & Nutrition$6k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $105,691, the rows itemized in this filing. The $120,891 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$575k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLOE INC$30,000
EVIDENT BATTERY INC$10,000
FINIKS FORGE INC$10,000
HIGHLAND PARK TECHNOLOGIES INC$10,000
ANDROS INNOVATIONS INC$10,000
MANTEL CAPTURE INC$9,691
GENWRIGHT B CORP$8,000
ATLAS URBAN FARMS LLC$6,000
ACTIVE SURFACES INC$6,000
STARCUBE INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ATACAMA BIOMATERIALS INC: $23k → 8%FASCIA SLEEP INCORPORATED: $10k → 10%SPADXTECH LLC: $10k → 11%ELATEQ INC: $7k → 12%AEROSHIELD MATERIALS INC: $14k → 16%SUSTAINABLE ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT (SEED): $12k → 14%KLAW INDUSTRIES: $10k → 20%FINIKS FORGE INC: $10k → 20%GENWRIGHT B CORP: $8k → 7%STARCUBE INC: $6k → 9%FLOE INC: $30k → 12%AQUAGGA INC: $20k → 9%ANDROS INNOVATIONS INC: $10k → 8%HOT ICE INNOVATIONS LLC DBA POWERHOUSE: $6k → 10%AEROSHIELD MATERIALS INC: $10k → 16%FLOE INC: $10k → 12%ROBIGO INC: $25k → 8%TATUM ROBOTICS: $10k → 16%BRASH ENGINES INC: $10k → 12%MANTEL CAPTURE INC: $10k → 8%ATLAS URBAN FARMS LLC: $6k → 16%SEDMED INC: $20k → 12%ACTIVE SURFACES INC: $6k → 8%GENERATION HEMP INC: $10k → 16%LIFTWAVE INC DBA RISE ROBOTICS: $10k → 8%HIGHLAND PARK TECHNOLOGIES INC: $10k → 8%EVIDENT BATTERY INC: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2019 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLOE INC: $40,000 · OtherFLOE INCROBIGO INC: $25,000 · OtherROBIGO INCAeroshield Materials Inc: $24,325 · OtherAeroshield Materials IncATACAMA BIOMATERIALS INC: $23,000 · OtherATACAMA BIOMATERIALS INCSEDMED INC: $20,000 · OtherSEDMED INCAQUAGGA INC: $19,500 · OtherAQUAGGA INCSUSTAINABLE ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT (SEED): $12,000 · Other+18 more: $158,191 · Other+18 more
Other$322,016

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greentownorg’s filings →

More from the funding graph