· Public charity
Greencroft Communities Foundation Inc
Greencroft communities foundation is committed to creating a passion for our communities and inspiring generosity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $2,349,792 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,508,245 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,158,453 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k1 grant · $130k
- $250k+3 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREENCROFT GOSHEN | $1,147,219 |
| GREENCROFT MIDDLEBURY INC | $590,073 |
| OAK GROVE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC | $482,500 |
| WALNUT HILLS RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC | $130,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GMGREENCROFT MIDDLEBURY INC5× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +211% · 39% of their budget
- GGGREENCROFT GOSHEN INC5× · 2017–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +62%
- OGOAK GROVE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC4× · 2022–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +28%
Funded once
- GCGREENCROFT CENTRAL MANOR INCone grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Greencroft communities foundation is committed to creating a passion for our communities and inspiring generosity.
Edgewater place, inc. is a non-profit assisted living community, located in plain city, ohio. it serves residents in the central ohio area, including nearby dublin, delaware, hilliard, london, powell, westerville and marysville. it is…
Greencroft communities creates dynamic living communities that embrace the creativity, contributions and challenges of aging for all, grounded in service excellence, compassionate care and mennonite values.
Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve
Garden Path Elder Living operates a residential care home for elders that provide assistance with daily living and nursing oversight.
The mission of rolling green village is to serve senior adults by providing an environment that enriches quality of life and fosters the highest level of independence possible in a setting nurtured by and established on christian ideals.
Wesley commons is a continuing care retirement community that provides value-based health services, including assisted living, intermediate and skilled nursing care, specialized care for alzheimer's and dementia-related illnesses, as well…
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greencroft Middlebury Inc and the most unlike its peers is Golden Years Homestead Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREENCROFT MIDDLEBURY INC ↗
- Who funds GREENCROFT GOSHEN INC ↗
- Who funds OAK GROVE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds WALNUT HILLS RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HUBBARD HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds Golden Years Homestead Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHFIELD VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds GREENCROFT CENTRAL MANOR INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greencroft Communities Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.