· Private foundation
Green Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $370k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $259k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HARMONY & LOVE RANCH | $158,500 |
| DARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $50,000 |
| PROMISES 2 KIDS | $34,000 |
| ANGEL BAND PROJECT | $33,500 |
| FAR AWAY FRIENDS | $30,000 |
| TEMPLE SINAI | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| THE GAN TEMPLE SINAI | $20,000 |
| EASTER SEALS SOUTHWEST FLORIDA | $20,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF ST LOUIS | $20,000 |
| VISIONS GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT | $20,000 |
| NAMI OF SARASOTA CO | $20,000 |
| THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD | $20,000 |
| RISE ABOVE PERFORMING ARTS | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $593k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NRNO RES GOURMET2× · 2021–2022 · $241k · revenue +395% · 64% of their budget
- RARISE ABOVE PERFORMING ARTS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $155k · revenue +191%
- FAFAR AWAY FRIENDS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- VFVII Foundationone grant, 2020 · $70k · 100% of their budget
- TMTWE MEMORIAL FUNDone grant, 2021 · $20k
- VMVISIBLE MEN ACADEMY INCone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.
Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…
University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…
Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.
The mission of groves learning organization is to build confidence and success for learners, particularly those with learning differences such as dyslexia, adhd and executive function challenges. through research-based approaches and…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
A coeducational episcopal day school, preschool through eighth grade, for students of all faiths.
Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Arc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sarasota Manatee Assoc for Riding Therapy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis ↗
- Who funds NO RES GOURMET ↗
- Who funds RHONDA'S HEART INC ↗
- Who funds RISE ABOVE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds FAR AWAY FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANGEL BAND PROJECT ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds Easter Seals Southwest Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds VII Foundation ↗
- Who funds Faith and Action for Strength Together Inc ↗
- Who funds Sarasota Manatee Assoc for Riding Therapy Inc ↗
- Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
- Who funds Stray Rescue of St Louis ↗
- Who funds ROSSMAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VISIONS GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT ↗
- Who funds VISIBLE MEN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds The Brain Observatory ↗
- Who funds Healthy Teens Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · Trio Foundation of St Louis · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Louis and Gloria Flanzer Philanthropic Trust · Msc Foundation Inc · William G and Marie Selby Foundation Inc · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Green Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Easter Seals Southwest Florida Inc — 12% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.