Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Greater Palm Springs Tourism Foundation

To support issues pertaining to the tourism industry including but not limited to raising funds from the general public and other sources to carry on programs directly and to provide support and services related to the hospitality convention and tourism industries in the Greater Palm Springs region including but not limited to providing…

$303k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Community Improvement$806kEmployment$39kEducation$20kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $186,141 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $302,809 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $116,668 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$19,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$725k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
City of Palm Springs$50,000
City of Palm Desert$50,000
City of Desert Hot Springs$28,141
College of the Desert Foundation$19,500
CSUSB Philanthropic Foundation$11,000
Coachella Valley Unified School District$10,000
Palm Springs Unified School District$10,000
Desert Sands Unified School District$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%City of Palm Desert: $50k → 11%City of Palm Desert: $50k → 11%City of Palm Desert: $50k → 11%City of Rancho Mirage: $66k → 11%Palm Springs Unified School District: $10k → 11%College of the Desert Foundation: $20k → 11%City of Rancho Mirage: $50k → 11%CSUSB Philanthropic Foundation: $11k → 11%City of Palm Springs: $50k → 11%City of Palm Springs: $50k → 11%City of Cathedral City: $30k → 11%City of Desert Hot Springs: $28k → 11%Cathedral City: $9k → 11%City of Desert Hot Springs: $6k → 11%City of Indian Wells: $50k → 11%City of Cathedral City: $9k → 11%City of Desert Hot Springs: $6k → 11%City of Indian Wells: $50k → 11%City of La Quinta: $134k → 11%City of La Quinta: $50k → 11%Coachella Valley Unified School District: $10k → 11%City of Indio: $41k → 11%Desert Sands Unified School District: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$512k · 5 repeat orgs$357k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$512k
$299k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    City of La Quinta
    2× · 2023–2024 · $184k
  • CO
    City of Palm Desert
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k
  • CO
    City of Palm Springs
    2× · 2023–2025 · $100k

Funded once

  • CO
    City of Rancho Mirage
    one grant, 2024 · $66k
  • CO
    City of Indian Wells
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • CO
    City of Rancho Mirage
    one grant, 2022 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

City of La Quinta — $183,750 · OtherCity of La QuintaCity of Palm Desert — $150,000 · OtherCity of Palm DesertCity of Palm Springs — $100,000 · OtherCity of Palm SpringsCity of Rancho Mirage — $66,250 · OtherCity of Rancho MirageCity of Indian Wells — $50,000 · OtherCity of Indian WellsCity of Rancho Mirage — $50,000 · OtherCity of Rancho MirageCity of Indian Wells — $49,643 · OtherCity of Indian WellsCITY OF INGLEWOOD — $41,401 · OtherCity of Desert Hot Springs — $39,641 · OtherCity of Cathedral City — $38,676 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $33,404 · Other+4 more — $36,250 · OtherCollege of the Desert Foundation — $19,500 · EducationCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $11,000 · Philanthropy
Other$839,015Education$19,500Philanthropy$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCollege of the Desert Foundation — $19,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds College of the Desert Foundation
  • Who funds CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Bighorn Golf Club Charities IncCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greater Palm Springs Tourism Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Greater Palm Springs Tourism Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Greater Palm Springs Tourism Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph