Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Wisconsin · Public charity

Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development

The Greater Milwaukee Committee is a private sector civic organization that aims to contribute to the cultural and economic base of the Milwaukee area. Continued on Schedule O.

$522k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$128,750
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$2.0M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Philanthropy$180k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2025 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Wisconsin$187,4261n/a
Milwaukee School of Engineering$85,06410%
Milwaukee Community Service Corps Inc$45,3151n/a
The Business Council Inc$25,0001n/a
Mount Mary University Inc$24,00010%
Carroll University Inc$22,72410%
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc$15,20011%
Alverno College$15,00010%
Riverworks Development Corporation$8,00010%

Compare Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development with peer funders

About Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development

How much does Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development give?
Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development reported 11 grants totaling $522,355 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development fund?
By grant dollars over FY2025 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Who are Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2025 to FY2025: University of Wisconsin ($187k), Milwaukee School of Engineering ($85k), Milwaukee Community Service Corps Inc ($45k).
Where is Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development based?
Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home