Skip to content

· Public charity

Greater Grand Rapids Chamber Foundation

To provide programming and funding that encourages free enterprise, enhances the quality of life in the greater Grand Rapids area, or otherwise serves a charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purpose.

$1.4M
Granted FY2020
39
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 39 grants below total $318,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,419,626 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,101,626 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k24 grants · $168k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $150k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DDR Restaurant Group LLC$10,000
Chelsea Marketig dba Bob's Bar$10,000
Littlebird$10,000
Simply a Loving Touch Homecare$10,000
Roam by San Chez$10,000
EA Restaurant Acquisition LLC$10,000
Euro Bistro$10,000
40 Acres Lifesyles dba Forty Acres Soul Kitchen$10,000
Field & Fire cafe$10,000
Chase Creative$10,000
Alebird Taphouse and Brewery$10,000
Grand Rapids Gymnastics$10,000
Nye Uniform$10,000
Bottega Salon$10,000
Flirt Fitness Studio$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%DDR Restaurant Group LLC: $10k → 8%Alebird Taphouse and Brewery: $10k → 11%Peppermill Cafe Inc: $7k → 8%Good Samaritans Medical Transport: $7k → 11%Coldbreak Brewing: $7k → 8%Grand Rapids Gymnastics: $10k → 11%Intaglio: $7k → 8%Euro Bistro: $10k → 11%Renewal Skin Spa: $7k → 11%Fleet Quest Logistics: $7k → 11%EMF Logistics: $7k → 11%Emonae Korean Restaurant: $7k → 11%Jam'n Bean LLC: $7k → 11%Chase Creative: $10k → 11%Gymco: $7k → 11%Littlebird: $10k → 11%West MI Window Washing: $7k → 11%40 Acres Lifesyles dba Forty Acres Soul Kitchen: $10k → 11%Array of Engineers: $7k → 11%Flirt Fitness Studio: $10k → 11%Uncle Cheetahs Soup Shop: $7k → 11%Urban Massage: $7k → 11%Berry Organic Acai LLC: $7k → 11%MooMoo LLC: $7k → 11%J Bradley Productions LLC dba Voyage Pictures: $7k → 11%Mason Rock Contracting LLC: $7k → 11%Simply a Loving Touch Homecare: $10k → 11%Jaku Sushi and Grill: $7k → 11%Bottega Salon: $10k → 11%Nye Uniform: $10k → 11%CF Group LLC dba One Bourbon: $7k → 11%Chelsea Marketig dba Bob's Bar: $10k → 11%Field & Fire cafe: $10k → 11%EA Restaurant Acquisition LLC: $10k → 11%Roam by San Chez: $10k → 11%AAQUIST LLC dba Fusion Salon: $7k → 11%The Firesian Gastrob Pub: $7k → 11%Cinco De Mayo: $7k → 11%Metro Engineering of Grand Rapids: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2020.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2020 to 2020, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+39 more: $318,000 · Other+39 more
Other$318,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Right Place IncMI18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Right Place Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $47k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greater Grand Rapids Chamber’s filings →

More from the funding graph