· Public charity
Great Plains Improvement Foundation
To imporove the condition of underpiviliged indviduals in the service area
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Embrace Hope Collaboratorium Inc | $110,000 |
| St Johns Missionary Baptist Church | $80,000 |
| New Life Fellowship Church | $60,000 |
| Next Step TLP Inc | $50,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2024–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2024 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 4 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Great Plains Improvement Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Great Plains Improvement Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.