Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership

To recognize, conserve, preserve, and interpret the historical, cultural, archaeological, natural, scenic, and recreational resources of the great basin national heritage area.

$298k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 94% of GREAT BASIN HERITAGE AREA PARTNERSHIP’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 20 grants below total $279,251 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $298,247 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,996 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $240k
$12,526
Median grant
States reached
$542k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE TERRITORIAL STATEHOU$30,000
SPRING VALLEY INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE$24,269
Individual grant recipient$24,250
DOWNWINDERS$23,233
GREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIO$20,000
CENTENNIAL FINE ARTS CENTER$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,498
TOPAZ MUSEUM$13,573
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$13,363
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$12,526
Individual grant recipient$12,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$11,169
Individual grant recipient$10,130
WHITE PINE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
WHITE PINE PUBLIC MUSEUM$8,330
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DESERET HERITAGE PARK: $18k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$673k · 18 repeat orgs$536k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +188% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
28

Total granted

$673k
$381k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+188%
+26%

Still filing today

6%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k
  • GB
    GREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIO
    4× · 2021–2025 · $76k
  • OC
    OLD CAPITOL STORYTELLING FESTIVAL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $59k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $66k
  • WP
    WHITE PINE COMMUNITY CHOIR
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $99,542 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIO — $76,000 · OtherGREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIOIndividual grant recipient — $66,207 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOLD CAPITOL STORYTELLING FESTIVAL — $58,671 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $55,000 · OtherNEVADA NORTHERN RAILWAY — $44,962 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE TERRITORIAL STATEHOU — $42,500 · OtherCENTENNIAL FINE ARTS CENTER — $40,000 · Other+43 more — $655,934 · Other+43 moreGREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $31,500 · EnvironmentDESERET HERITAGE ASSOCIATION — $17,545 · Human ServicesNational Speleological Society — $12,654 · Recreation & SportsTOPAZ MUSEUM — $8,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,138,816Environment$31,500Human Services$17,545Recreation & Sports$12,654Arts & Culture$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $31,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetDESERET HERITAGE ASSOCIATION — $17,545 over 1y, 21% of budgetNational Speleological Society — $12,654 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTOPAZ MUSEUM — $8,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DESERET HERITAGE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds National Speleological Society

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership?

    Find your warmest path to Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph