Skip to content
Grayson County Health Clinic at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Grayson County Health Clinic

GRAYSON COUNTY HEALTH CLINIC is dedicated to providing high quality and affordable primary and preventive care to the underserved resident of grayson county.

$3.6M
Granted FY2017
44
Grants FY2017
10
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 44 grants below total $3,509,271, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,648,202 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $138,931 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k11 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $565k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $734k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.1M
$21,695
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UHS OF TEXOMA TMC$1,268,442
WILSON N JONES REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR$866,286
Individual grant recipient$158,160
NEW HORIZONS PAIN CENTER$147,114
HERITAGE PARK SURGICAL HOSPITAL$121,914
UHS OF TEXOMA INC$95,228
RX OUTREACH$82,267
SHERMAN MD PROVIDERS INC$67,906
LABCORP OF AMERICA HOLDINGS$61,371
NORTH TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CARDIOLOG$41,306
TEXOMA NEUROLOGY ASSOCIATES$41,045
Individual grant recipient$36,735
CORRECT RX PHARMACY SERVICES$33,298
US ANESTHESIA PARTNERS TX LC$30,667
Individual grant recipient$30,436
02The need
02

Where the grant dollars land

Across the US and around the world.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
IN
CA
MO
MD
NC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
Grants placed by each grantee’s location, read from the 990 filings.
03Its field
03the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UHS OF TEXOMA TMC: $1,268,442 · OtherUHS OF TEXOMA TMCWILSON N JONES REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR: $866,286 · OtherWILSON N JONES REGIONAL MEDICAL CTRIndividual grant recipient: $158,160 · OtherNEW HORIZONS PAIN CENTER: $147,114 · OtherHERITAGE PARK SURGICAL HOSPITAL: $121,914 · Other+37 more: $849,642 · Other+37 moreRX Outreach Inc: $82,267 · HealthHealthTexas Provider Network: $15,446 · Health
Other$3,411,558Health$97,713

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRX Outreach Inc: $82,267 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHealthTexas Provider Network: $15,446 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RX Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds HealthTexas Provider Network ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grayson County Health Clinic funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grayson County Health Clinic. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Grayson County Health Clinic?

    Find your warmest path to Grayson County Health Clinic through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2.3M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grayson County Health Clinic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home