Skip to content

· Community foundation

Granville Community Foundation

To serve the community of granville, ohio.

$98k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0170% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$72kHousing & Shelter$58kArts & Culture$36kHuman Services$24kEducation$16kCommunity Improvement$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $74,879, the rows itemized in this filing. The $97,900 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $23,021 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
LICKING COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY$12,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
GRANVILLE K-6 PTO$9,000
NEWARK ORG FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS$7,500
LICKING COUNTY COALITION OF HOUSING$6,379
GRANVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSUEM$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BRYN DU COMMISSION: $25k → 10%GRANVILLE KIWANIS: $15k → 10%GRANVILLE KIWANIS: $14k → 10%GRANVILLE KIWANIS: $12k → 10%GRANVILLE KIWANIS: $12k → 10%BRYN DU COMMISSION: $11k → 10%LICKING COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%GRANVILLE TURKEY TROT: $10k → 10%GRANVILLE TURKEY TROT: $10k → 10%GRANVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $10k → 10%GRANVILLE TURKEY TROT: $10k → 10%GRANVILLE TURKEY TROT: $10k → 10%GRANVILLE TURKEY TROT: $10k → 10%GRANVILLE K-6 PTO: $9k → 10%GRANVILLE AREA CIC: $9k → 10%LICKING COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 10%GRANVILLE RECREATION DISTRICT: $8k → 10%GRANVILLE PARENT CO-OP SCHOOL: $7k → 10%GRANVILLE RECREATION DISTRICT: $6k → 10%BRYN DU COMMISSION: $6k → 10%BRYN DU COMMISSION: $6k → 10%LICKING COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 10%GRANVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSUEM: $6k → 10%LICKING COUNTY COALITION OF HOUSING: $30k → 10%LICKING COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY: $13k → 10%LICKING COUNTY COALITION OF HOUSING: $9k → 10%NEWARK ORG FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS: $8k → 10%NEWARK ORG FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS: $8k → 10%NEWARK ORG FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS: $8k → 10%NEWARK ORG FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS: $8k → 10%LICKING COUNTY COALITION OF HOUSING: $7k → 10%LICKING COUNTY COALITION OF HOUSING: $6k → 10%LICKING COUNTY COALITION OF HOUSING: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$277k · 7 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against -45% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$277k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
-45%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LICKING COUNTY COALITION OF HOUSING
    5× · 2020–2024 · $58k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2024 · $53k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k

Funded once

  • GA
    Granville Athletic Boosters
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -45%
  • GP
    GRANVILLE PARENT CO-OP SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LICKING COUNTY COALITION OF HOUSING: $58,315 · OtherLICKING COUNTY COALITION OF HOUSINGIndividual grant recipient: $53,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLICKING COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER FOR 60 ADULTS INC: $23,512 · OtherLICKING COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER FOR 60 ADULTS INCGRANVILLE RECREATION DISTRICT: $13,905 · OtherGRANVILLE RECREATION DISTRICTLICKING COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherGRANVILLE K-6 PTO: $9,000 · Other+2 more: $12,484 · OtherTHE BRYN DU COMMISSION: $47,920 · Recreation & SportsTHE BRYN DU COMM…Newark Organization for the Creative Art: $30,000 · Arts & CultureNewark Org…Granville Athletic Boosters: $10,000 · Education
Other$241,716Recreation & Sports$47,920Arts & Culture$30,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BRYN DU COMMISSION: $47,920 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetNewark Organization for the Creative Art: $30,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetLICKING COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER FOR 60 ADULTS INC: $23,512 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetGranville Athletic Boosters: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BRYN DU COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds Newark Organization for the Creative Art ↗
  • Who funds LICKING COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER FOR 60 ADULTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Granville Athletic Boosters ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Licking Memorial Health FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Licking Memorial Health Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Granville Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Granville Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Granville’s filings →

    More from the funding graph