Skip to content

· Public charity

Grand Rapids Jaycees Foundation

To provide charitable assistance to promote community involvement in community affairs and promote the welfare of the community and its citizens.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Community Improvement$40kYouth Development$21kAnimals$15kEnvironment$10kHuman Services$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kRecreation & Sports$7kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Code on Wheels$7,500
New City Neighbors$7,500
WMCAT$5,800
Kent Intermediate School District$5,000
CASA of Kent County$5,000
Childrens Healing Center$5,000
WGVU Public Media$5,000
IKUS Life EnrichmentIndian Trails$4,675
Feral Cat Solutions$4,500
Larlen Communications$3,750
Brooklyn Elias Promise$3,196
Remembrance Ranch$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Camp Casey: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action Network

Community action network partners with children, youth and families from under-resourced washtenaw county michigan neighborhoods to create better futures for themselves, and improve the communities in which they live.

Human Services
2
Lenawee Humane Society

Our mission is to save the lives of animals while enriching the lives of humans.

Animals
3
Michigan Casa Inc

Michigan casa, inc. is dedicated to changing the lives of abused and neglected children by advocating for their best interests through establishing, supporting, and expanding quality casa programs throughout the state of michigan to ensure…

Civil Rights
4
Bird Center of Michigan Inc

Rescue, care for, and release abandoned and injured birds.

—
5
Community Cats and Friends

To provide services to promote the health and well-being of the homeless cat population in owosso, michigan, and to manage this population through spay and neuter services and education. we also facilitate the adoption of stray or…

Animals
6
Canine Kid-U-Cation
Animals
7
Camp Cavell Conservancy

Camp cavell conservancy has committed itself to providing stewardship of the property while continuing to provide camp experiences for children and adults in the lexington, port huron, metropolitan detroit and other communities throughout…

Recreation & Sports
8
Wayne County Court Appointed Special Advocates

To ensure that children who have experienced abuse and/or neglect are in safe and permanent homes by recruiting, screening and training volunteers to advocate on their behalf within the third judicial circuit court's family juvenile…

Human Services
9
Voices for Children Advocacy

Voices For Children is dedicated to serving the child victim and victim families of child abuse in Genesee & Shiawassee County and enhancing the lives of all children through education and increasing community involvement.

Crime & Legal
10
Wildside Rehabilitation and Education Center

Wildside Rehabilitation and Education Center is a non-profit organization opened in 1995 and devoted to the rehabilitation and release of sick, injured, and orphaned wildlife. We are one of the largest wildlife rehabilitation centers in…

Animals
11
Child Abuse & Neglect Council Great Lakes Bay Region

We are building communities where children are free from abuse and neglect through prevention, intervention, and advocacy efforts.

—
12
Local Circles

Local circles offers young detroiters an employment opportunity in youth- led research. by employing youth to do research, local circles intervenes on two simultaneous social issues facing young detroiters today: youth unemployment and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Healing Center; the most unlike its peers is Feral Cat Solutions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GR JCI COMMUNITY DEV PROJECTS: $39,500 · OtherGR JCI COMMUNITY DEV PROJECTSGIRLS ON THE RUN: $8,676 · OtherGIRLS ON THE RUNSCHOOL EMERGENCY RESPONSE COALITION: $7,500 · OtherSCHOOL EMERGENCY RESPONSE COALITIONBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $7,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAFriends of GR Parks: $6,969 · OtherFriends of GR ParksWMCAT: $5,800 · OtherEquest Center: $5,000 · OtherKent Intermediate School District: $5,000 · OtherHumane Society: $5,000 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherIKUS Life EnrichmentIndian Trails: $4,675 · OtherMel Trotter Mission: $4,575 · Other+5 more: $13,041 · Other+5 moreCODE ON WHEELS: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentCODE ON WHEE…NEW CITY NEIGHBORS: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentNEW CITY NEI…ELE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentELE'S PLACE …COMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PA: $10,000 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY…FERAL CAT SOLUTIONS: $4,500 · AnimalsFERAL CAT…BLANDFORD NATURE CENTER: $10,000 · EducationCAMP CASEY CORPORATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesCASA of Kent County Inc: $5,000 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER: $5,000 · Health
Other$118,236Youth Development$20,000Animals$14,500Education$10,000Human Services$5,000Civil Rights$5,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLANDFORD NATURE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCODE ON WHEELS: $7,500 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP CASEY CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCASA of Kent County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFERAL CAT SOLUTIONS: $4,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetREMEMBRANCE RANCH: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLANDFORD NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PA ↗
  • Who funds CODE ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds NEW CITY NEIGHBORS ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP CASEY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Kent County Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FERAL CAT SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds LARLEN COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds REMEMBRANCE RANCH ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grand Rapids Jaycees Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grand Rapids Jaycees Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Grand Rapids Jaycees Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Grand Rapids Jaycees Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grand Rapids Jaycees’ filings →

    More from the funding graph