Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Graham Music Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$327kEducation$39kHealth$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$851k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL$20,000
MORAVIAN UNIVERSITY$12,000
ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC$5,000
ALLENTOWN BAND INC$5,000
YOUNG PEOPLES PHILHARMONIC LEHIGH VALLEY$5,000
GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK$2,000
PENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA$2,000
CEDAR CREST COLLEGE$2,000
LEHIGH VALLEY ITALIAN AMERICAN BAND$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PENNSYLVANIA PHILHARMONIC: $8k → 10%LEHIGH VALLEY ITALIAN AMERICAN BAND: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $30k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA PHILHARMONIC: $2k → 10%LEHIGH VALLEY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $26k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA PHILHARMONIC: $5k → 10%COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $21k → 11%ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 11%ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 11%ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 11%ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $5k → 11%ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $5k → 11%ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $5k → 11%ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $20k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA: $3k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA: $2k → 11%ALLENTOWN BAND INC: $10k → 11%ALLENTOWN BAND INC: $10k → 11%ALLENTOWN BAND INC: $10k → 11%ALLENTOWN BAND INC: $8k → 11%ALLENTOWN BAND INC: $8k → 11%ALLENTOWN BAND INC: $7k → 11%CEDAR CREST COLLEGE: $5k → 11%CEDAR CREST COLLEGE: $5k → 11%ALLENTOWN BAND INC: $5k → 11%CEDAR CREST COLLEGE: $2k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD REHABITATION NETWORK: $5k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD REHABITATION NETWORK: $5k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK: $4k → 11%LEHIGH VALLEY ITALIAN AMERICAN BAND: $3k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK: $3k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD REHABITATION NETWORK: $3k → 11%LEHIGH VALLEY ITALIAN AMERICAN BAND: $2k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK: $2k → 11%SATORI LTD: $1k → 11%SATORI LTD: $1k → 11%SATORI LTD: $1k → 11%NORTHWESTERN LEHIGH EDUCATIONAL FDN: $5k → 11%MORAVIAN UNIVERSITY: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$344k · 10 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$344k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+31%

Still filing today

80%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $172k · revenue +18%
  • AB
    ALLENTOWN BAND INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +32%
  • AS
    ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $50k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CAMERATA SINGERS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • LV
    LEHIGH VALLEY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Warminster Symphony Society

Performs classical music for the community

2
Philadelphia Sinfonia Association

The organization supports the artistic growth of young musicians from a diverse student population in the delaware valley by providing opportunities for high-level ensemble experience in a supportive educational environment.

Arts & Culture
3
South Paulding High School Band South Pa Boosters
Education
4
Concerto Soloists Chamber Orchestra of Philadelphia

To be a sustainable musical institution that brings the intimate experience of a world-class chamber orchestra performance to the greater philadelphia area,enriching the musical life of the city and region by the integrity and excellence…

Arts & Culture
5
Pennsylvania Music Educators Association

Promote quality music education

Arts & Culture
6
American Chamber Ensemble Inc

The American Chamber Ensemble is a consortium of distinguished musicians whose concerts explore the music for piano with strings, woodwinds and/or voice, presenting both great standard repertoire and living American composers.

7
Philadelphia Chamber Ensemble

Offering Professional Music Concerts

8
Gilbert Productions Inc

Musical proformance education.

Arts & Culture
9
Philadelphia Chamber Music Society

To engage our community in a life more beautiful through the shared experience and transformative impact of chamber music, by arranging diverse and compelling programs by exceptional artists at affordable prices, and by presenting new…

Arts & Culture
10
Vanguard Concerts
11
Southeastern Pennsylvania Symphony Orchestra Society Inc

Presentation of symphony orchestra and chamber music concerts benefiting 50-700 patrons per event

12
Pittsburgh Symphony Inc

It is the mission of the pittsburgh symphony orchestra to engage, enrich, and inspire through unparalleled live musical experiences.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pennsylvania Sinfonia Orchestra and the most unlike its peers is Pennsylvania Philharmonic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL — $172,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOLALLENTOWN BAND INC — $58,000 · Arts & CultureALLENTOWN BAND INCALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INCPENNSYLVANIA PHILHARMONIC — $14,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $7,500 · Arts & CultureGOOD SHEPHERD REHABITATION NETWORK — $12,500 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD REHA…MORAVIAN UNIVERSITY — $12,000 · OtherMORAVIAN UNIVERSIT…THE CAMERATA SINGERS — $10,000 · OtherTHE CAMERATA SINGE…LEHIGH VALLEY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherLEHIGH VALLEY CHAR…LEHIGH VALLEY ITALIAN AMERICAN BAND — $9,500 · OtherLEHIGH VALLEY ITAL…YOUNG PEOPLES PHILHARMONIC LEHIGH VALLEY — $5,000 · OtherYOUNG PEOPLES PHIL…Individual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…CEDAR CREST COLLEGE — $12,000 · EducationNORTHWESTERN LEHIGH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · EducationGOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK — $8,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$302,000Other$64,000Education$17,000Health$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL — $172,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetALLENTOWN BAND INC — $58,000 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA PHILHARMONIC — $14,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetCEDAR CREST COLLEGE — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMORAVIAN UNIVERSITY — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWESTERN LEHIGH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA — $4,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSATORI LTD — $3,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL
  • Who funds ALLENTOWN BAND INC
  • Who funds ALLENTOWN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA PHILHARMONIC
  • Who funds CEDAR CREST COLLEGE
  • Who funds MORAVIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD REHABILITATION NETWORK
  • Who funds NORTHWESTERN LEHIGH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA SINFONIA ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds SATORI LTD

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amaranth FoundationPA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amaranth Foundation · Harry C Trexler Estate · The Century Fund Trust · Flach Music Fund · Ppl Foundation · The Presser Foundation · Seruga R Char · Dexter F and Dorothy H Baker Foundation · Sylvia Perkin Perpetual Charitable Trust · Julius & Katheryn Hommer Foundation · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Graham Music Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph