Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grace C Stebbins Tua

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$147k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$326kEducation$251kEnvironment$193kInternational$114kCivil Rights$95kHealth$74kPublic Benefit$72kHuman Services$54kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $92k
$7,606
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VASSAR COLLEGE$22,817
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY$21,296
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$21,296
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE INC$14,879
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE$12,170
PIERCE COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE ASSN$7,606
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC$7,606
NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL$7,606
LEARNING ALLY$7,606
US CMTE FOR REFUGEES & IMMIGRANTS$5,705
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$5,705
SAVE THE CHILDREN$5,705
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSN$3,043
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION$3,043
UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $109k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $1k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $9k → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $9k → 11%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $1k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $8k → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $8k → 11%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $1k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $7k → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $7k → 11%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $1k → 17%LEARNING ALLY: $7k → 11%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $1k → 17%LEARNING ALLY: $7k → 11%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $1k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $7k → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $7k → 11%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $1k → 17%LEARNING ALLY: $7k → 11%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $1k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $6k → 9%LEARNING ALLY: $6k → 11%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $1k → 17%LEARNING ALLY: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 22 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
0

Total granted

$1.3M
$0

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $188k · revenue +19%
  • TW
    THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +27%
  • DO
    Defenders of Wildlife
    9× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +43%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    World Wildlife Fund Inc

    Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

    Environment
    2
    Rainforest Trust

    Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

    International
    3
    Property and Environment Research Center

    Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

    Public Benefit
    4
    Predator Defense

    Protecting vital native predators & ending war on wildlife.

    Animals
    5
    International Snow Leopard Trust

    The international snow leopard trust aims to ethically conserve snow leopards and their high mountain ecosystems through partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities, and through research to improve the understanding of snow…

    Animals
    6
    Conservation Society of California

    Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

    Animals
    7
    Panthera Corporation

    Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

    Animals
    8
    Wildlife Alliance Inc

    Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

    Animals
    9
    Conservation International Foundation

    Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

    Environment
    10
    Wild Landscapes Inc

    Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

    Animals
    11
    Wildlife Conservation Society

    The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

    Animals
    12
    Denver Zoological Foundation

    Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

    Animals
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wilderness Society; the most unlike its peers is Pierce County Animal Welfare Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/11
    Grantees still filing
    9/11
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    VASSAR COLLEGE: $188,430 · OtherVASSAR COLLEGENATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $175,871 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETYAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $95,071 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEEAMERICAN FRIENDS SVC COMM INC: $71,620 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SVC COMM INCNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $36,768 · OtherUS CMTE FOR REFUGEES & IMMIGRANTS: $27,576 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $26,047 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $26,047 · OtherGUIDING EYES FOR THE: $26,047 · Other+3 more: $40,370 · Other+3 moreTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $178,130 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SO…NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $14,710 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CO…Defenders of Wildlife: $98,239 · AnimalsDefenders of …PIERCE COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION: $36,768 · AnimalsPIERCE COUNTY…NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $14,710 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILD…Learning Ally Inc: $62,815 · Human ServicesLearning …GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $36,768 · Human ServicesGUIDING E…UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WA…International Rescue Committee INC: $47,113 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $47,110 · International
    Other$713,847Environment$192,840Animals$149,717Human Services$108,583International$94,223

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $188,430 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $178,130 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $98,239 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $62,815 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $47,113 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $47,110 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $36,768 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $14,710 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $14,710 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
    • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
    • Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗
    • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
    • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
    • Who funds PIERCE COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
    • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Grace C Stebbins Tua funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grace C Stebbins Tua. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
    • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
    • United Way of Pioneer Valley Inc: 10% of income from government
    • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grace C Stebbins Tua’s filings →

    More from the funding graph