Skip to content

California · Public charity

Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee

To support or oppose ballot measures in California.

$250k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$250,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$250,000
States reached, FY2022
1
Total assets, FY2022
$4.9M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
No on 30$250,00011%

Compare Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee?

Find your warmest path to Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee

How much does Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee give?
Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee reported 1 grants totaling $250,000 in its FY2022 IRS filing.
Who are Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2022: No on 30 ($250k).
Where is Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee based?
Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Governor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee’s filings →

More from the funding graph