Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gordon and Gayle Miller Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$320k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$658kEducation$480kEnvironment$175kHuman Services$97kPhilanthropy$95kReligion$86kHousing & Shelter$22kRecreation & Sports$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASPIRE RURAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$100,000
MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$100,000
WATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,000
SANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
CARLETON COLLEGE (ALUMNI FUND)$20,000
SOUTH HAVEN AREA RECREATIONAL AUTHORITY$20,000
CULLIGAN CARES$10,000
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$5,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$5,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CARLETON COLLEGE (ALUMNI FUND): $20k → 11%SOUTH HAVEN AREA RECREATIONAL AUTHORITY: $20k → 8%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $20k → 14%WATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $28k → 7%CULLIGAN CARES: $10k → 14%CARLETON COLLEGE (ALUMNI FUND): $20k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 14%WATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%CULLIGAN CARES: $10k → 14%CARLETON COLLEGE (ALUMNI FUND): $10k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 14%WATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%CULLIGAN CARES: $10k → 14%CARLETON COLLEGE (ALUMI FUND): $10k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 14%WATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%CULLIGAN CARES: $10k → 14%CARLETON COLLEGE (ALUMNI FUND): $10k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 14%WATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%CULLIGAN CARES: $10k → 14%CARLETON COLLEGE (ALUMI FUND): $10k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 14%WATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $14k → 7%CULLIGAN CARES: $10k → 14%WATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $13k → 7%ASPIRE RURAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%ASPIRE RURAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $100k → 14%MARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%MARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%MARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $70k → 14%MARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $60k → 14%MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $60k → 14%MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $40k → 14%MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $40k → 14%MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $30k → 14%MARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%MARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $30k → 14%MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $30k → 14%MARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $20k → 14%MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $20k → 14%SANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%SANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%SANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%SANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
MA
IA
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 13 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$1.5M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+46%

Still filing today

38%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WQ
    WATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $175k · revenue +428%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +26%
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $22k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • MG
    MAPLE GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
2
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

—
3
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
6
American College of Surgeons

The american college of surgeons is dedicated to improving the care of the surgical patient and to safeguarding standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment.

Education
7
American Neuromuscular Foundation

The american neuromuscular foundation was established to improve the quality of care for people with disorders of skeletal muscle, neuromuscular function, and central and peripheral nervous systems through the promotion of research and…

Health
8
Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation Inc

The sarnoff cardiovascular research foundation is dedicated to cultivating the next generation of physician-leaders in cardiovascular medicine by funding and supporting medical students and physicians engaged in transformative research.

Health
9
Medstar Health Research Institute Inc

See schedule omedstar health research institute is dedicated to supporting the academic platform of medstar health by conducting high quality translational and health sciences research throughout the medstar system.

—
10
The Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund Inc
—
11
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthritis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sanilac County Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $370,000 · OtherMARLETTE COMMUNITY SCHOOLSMARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $360,000 · OtherMARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONASPIRE RURAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherASPIRE RURAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONCULLIGAN CARES: $90,000 · OtherCULLIGAN CARESTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $85,000 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHCARLETON COLLEGE (ALUMNI FUND): $80,000 · OtherCARLETON COLLEGE (ALUMNI FUND)+8 more: $85,500 · Other+8 moreWATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $174,500 · EnvironmentWATER QUALIT…SANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $95,000 · PhilanthropyARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $24,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $24,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $22,000 · Housing & ShelterAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$1,270,500Environment$174,500Philanthropy$95,000Health$73,000Housing & Shelter$22,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $174,500 over 9y, 20% of budgetSANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $22,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WATER QUALITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gordon and Gayle Miller Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gordon and Gayle Miller Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gordon and Gayle Miller’s filings →

More from the funding graph